The Algorithm of Mara: How “Sacred” Violence is Manufactured by the False Prophets of Surveillance Capitalism

This is a critique of the recent video by PVK currently titled "War on Earth Transforming Our View of the Heavens"

This video is not a theological discussion. It is a piece of evidence. It documents the real-time collaboration between archetypes of the modern Right to construct a pipeline for Stochastic Terrorism.

1. The Priest (Jonathan Pageau): He performs Historical Negation on par with Holocaust denial. He erases the political/criminal nature of atrocities (Hiroshima, The Holocaust, Police Brutality) and rebrands them as "Sacred Events" necessary for the foundation of the world. He scapegoats religious authority (blaming the Pope for "demythologizing" the world) to set himself up as the new arbiter of Truth.
2. The Technocrat (Jordan Hall): He strips the mask off. He explicitly defines "5th Generation Warfare" as the use of a "Propaganda Field" to trigger a "Random Schizophrenic" into committing murder. He calls this process "Beautiful" and "Isomorphic with Spiritual Warfare."

The Mimetic Parasite:
These men speak in the language of "Tradition" and "Spirit," yet they preach Materialism and Machiavellianism. They are agents of Surveillance Capitalism who have realized that Confusion and Rage are profitable resources.

They attempt to co-opt the language of Christianity—mimicking concepts of “The Sacred" and "Sacrifice“—but they twist them.

• True Dharma: Teaches that Interconnectedness leads to Compassion.
• Their False Dharma: Teaches that Interconnectedness allows for Diffuse Causation (getting away with murder).

II. The Diagnostic: The Artificial Scarcity of Truth

When Jonathan Pageau looks at the world, he says, "Everything is muddy and nobody knows where they are." He calls this a spiritual crisis, a loss of "Sacred Foundations."

Do not believe him. The water is not muddy because God has abandoned us. The water is muddy because Corporate Banality is dumping toxic waste upstream.

1. The Manufacturing of the "Mud"

In the Dharma, we seek Yathābhūta—seeing things as they actually are. But in the digital age, seeing things as they are is bad for business.

The "Muddiness" Pageau complains about is actually Artificial Scarcity of Truth.

• The Mechanism: Social media platforms do not function as a "Public Square." They function as a Casino of Enragement.
• The Incentive: Truth is often boring. Nuance is quiet. But Lies, Hate, and Fear generate high-velocity engagement.
• The Betrayal: Silicon Valley executives, hiding behind the shield of "Section 230" and "Free Speech," have abdicated their duty as stewards. They are not protecting free speech; they are selling the microphone to the loudest psychopath. They have handed the controls of the public consciousness to whomever pays the most—be it a foreign adversary, a domestic fascist, or RICO style organized crime.

2. The Arsonist Posing as the Firefighter

Jordan Hall speaks of "5th Generation Warfare" and the "War on Sensemaking" as if he is a wise general observing the battlefield.

In reality, he is describing a Protection Racket run by the Private surveillance and (money laundering through posing as) advertising Industry.

• The Setup: Private surveillance firms and Data Brokers collect vast amounts of unnecessary, and often uncorrelated, spurious data directly from spam-for-hire RICO orgs, on citizens—your location, your fears, your medical history. This is a violation of the Fourth Amendment spirit, if not the letter.
• The Crime: They use this data to allow bad actors (Foreign Intelligence, Cartels, Domestic Extremists) to Micro-Target vulnerable individuals with radicalizing propaganda. They help build the "Propaganda Field" that triggers the "Random Schizophrenic." (or regular individual aggrieved by injustice)
• The Grift: When the violence inevitably happens (the shooting, the riot, the bomb), these same firms turn to the government and say, "The world is dangerous! You need to pay us millions to monitor these threats."

They are not firefighters. They are Arsonists in Firefighter Uniforms. They light the match of radicalization with one hand and hold out the collection plate for "Security" with the other.

3. The Betrayal via Algorithm

We must call this what it is: Betrayal.

• Against the Constitution: By enabling foreign adversaries to target US citizens with psychological warfare operations (PsyOps) on US soil, these platforms are aiding and abetting enemies of the state for profit.
• Against the Rule of Law: If a television station broadcasted child pornography or incitements to murder, they would lose their FCC license and go to prison. But because this incitement happens via underfunded and undermining their own moderation, or like Twitter, enabling express passes for accounts paid for with stolen credit cards, then Algorithmic Manipulation—hiding the crime inside a "Black Box" of code— "what poeople want" while they are actively manipulating them, like an regular extremist claiming their own desires are the "gods (or the publics) desires" they claim immunity. Which are bold faced lies. Certainly not truth in advertising.
• Against the People: They claim to offer "Freedom and Equality." But there is no equality when a neo-Nazi lies are "boosted" around the world six times before the Truth can put its shoes on. Because they expect the truth tellers to spend money on their platforms to be heard, then calling that "free speech" While all their corporate decisions are a mockery of the ideal.

The CosmoBuddhist Verdict

This is Adharma (Unrighteousness) on an industrial scale.

They have created a "Market Ideology" that values a click more than a human life. They have built a machine that acts as a super-spreader for misinformation, disinformation, addiction, mental illness and division not community.

When Pageau says, "We need a new foundation because the old one is exhausted," he is lying. The old foundation (Rule of Law, Human Rights) isn't exhausted; it is being suffocated by the very surveillance machinery he and his friends utilize to spread their bigotry and tribalism.

They broke the social contract on purpose, just so they could sell you the glue.

III. The Critique of the False Prophets: The Front Men of Digital Cartels

If the digital ecosystem is a crime scene involving organized crime and foreign subversion, what is the role of the three men in this video?
They are not the Kingpins. They are the Front Men. They are the "Clean Faces" utilized to sell the product of the scam centers to the West.

1. The Launderer of Violence: Jonathan Pageau (The Priest)

• The Role: In any money laundering operation, you need a legitimate business to wash the dirty cash. In the Stochastic Terrorism pipeline, Pageau washes the dirty intent.
• The Mechanism: He takes the raw, psychopathic violence of the "Troll Farm" (genocide, ethnic cleansing, vigilantism) and launders it through the language of Theology.
  • The "Troll Farm" says: "Kill the enemy."
  • Pageau says: "We need a Sacred Sacrifice to refound the world."
• The "Narrative" Scam: Note how "Narrative" replaces Ontology, and non-symbolic forms of knowing are deemed impossible. (implicitly suggesting that animals are not concious and do not “know” anything ) Pageau explicitly trades in "Story" while negating History.
  • Why? Because History (Ontology) has facts. Facts are inconvenient for criminals, and pundits.
  • Story (Narrative) is advertising. It can be rewritten to make the criminal look like a hero and the victim look like a "Sacred Necessity." He creates the Marketing Copy for Domestic Terrorism.

2. The Systems Spokesperson: Jordan Hall (The Technocrat)

• The Role: Every organized ring needs a specialist who understands the technical infrastructure—how to bypass security, how to hack the system.
• The Mechanism: Hall explains the "How-To" of the crime.
  • He explicitly connects the "Spam Ring" tactics (Propaganda Fields, Diffuse Causation) with Military Strategy (5th Gen Warfare).
  • He bridges the gap between the Troll Farm and the Target. He explains that to win, you must not just lie; you must shatter the victim's ability to accurately perceive reality ("The War on Sensemaking").
• The Hypocrisy: He presents himself as a "Sensemaker." In reality, he is an Engineer of Confusion. He admits that "Isomorphism" (making lies look like truth) is "Beautiful." He technocratizes the hit, turning the "Random Schizophrenic" into a guided missile for the cartel, or useful idiot for the geopolitical adversary.

These men are engaged in Spiritual Racketeering.
They mimic the forms of religion—the robes, the icons, the solemn tones—but they strip out the Moral Core (Compassion/Dharma). They replace it with the Market Logic of the scammer:

• Whatever works is "True."
• Whatever sells is "Sacred."
• Whatever kills the competition is "Good."

They are the Hollywood Dramatization of the "Disease of Affluence"—psychopathy dressed up as the identity they co-opt or infiltrate, sold to the lonely and the lost.

IV. The Economic Reveal: The Consigliere of Cyber-Crime

We must strip away the robes and look at the Org Chart.

Jonathan Pageau is not a prophet. He is the equivalent of a Middle-Manager in a Cyber-Crime Syndicate.

• The Ecosystem: The "Muddiness" he speaks of is not a spiritual mystery. It is the result of industrial-scale Spam Operations, disinformation/misinformation campaigns, Botnets, and Troll Farms. These are examples of criminal enterprises (often fronts for money laundering) that flood the internet with noise to drown out the signal of Truth.
• His Role (The Mob Lawyer): Pageau is like a lawyer on the payroll who tries to make crime look legal.
  • When the Cyber-Crime ring radicalizes a young man into murder, Pageau steps up to the podium.
  • He argues the "Affluence Defense" for the Soul. He claims that because the murderer was "starved of meaning" (affluence/peace), he was forced to kill to find the "Sacred."
  • He uses "Symbolism" and "Post-Modern" jargon as legal loopholes, creating a narrative where Crime becomes a Rite.

The "Narrative" Lie:
They claim that "Narratives are the only way humans understand things."

• The Science: This is biologically false. The human brain understands the world through pattern recognition, sensory data, and direct experience (Qualia).
• The Grift: They need you to believe that "Story" is everything, because they are Liars.
  • If you look at the Data (Reality), you see criminal racketeering.
  • If you look at the Story (Narrative), you see a "Spiritual War."
  • They rely on your ignorance of psychology to keep you trapped in their Story.

V. The Closing Dharma: Be the Firewall

How do we respond to the Algorithm of Mara?

1. Reject the "Sacred" as Violence
We reject the lie that the world needs blood to be stable. That is the logic of the Aztec Priest and the Mafia Don. The Cosmos is built on Interdependence, not human sacrifice.

2. See the "Mud" for what it is
When you feel confused, anxious, or "muddy," do not look for a Warlord to give you clarity.
Recognize that you are under a Cyber-Attack. You are being targeted by a deluge of misinformation designed to extract your attention and sell your rage.

• Mindfulness is the Firewall. It is the ability to pause, look at the "Propaganda Field," and say: "This is not Reality. This is a script."

3. The Final Verdict
Paul VanderKlay, Jonathan Pageau, and Jordan Hall are playing a dangerous game. They are dancing on the edge of a volcano they helped stoke.

They believe they can manage the "Schizophrenic" energy they are harvesting. But the nature of Stochastic Terrorism is that it is Stochastic—it is random.
Eventually, the "Random" actor will not distinguish between the Enemy and the Recruiter.
Eventually, the fire they are selling will burn down their own temple.

Next Step:
Do not be a "Node" in their memetic botnet. Do not be the "Kinetic Resource" (instrumentalized useful idiot) they harvest.
Be the Signal that breaks their Noise.

So without further ado, here is the transcript with CosmoBuddhist commentary.

War on Earth Transforming Our View of the Heavens

[PVK] : [00:00:00] Hi, this is Paul. I've renamed yet again. I noticed that, I learned that I can't rename a channel twice in 10 days, so I've got to wait to rename the whole Vanderclips and TLC Inductrination Station, something like that, that I named it. I'm continuing to play with the 24-hour live stream. You'll notice that there's no longer the live thing always on the main channel here, the Paul Vanderclips channel, but I moved it over to the Vanderclips channel, and you can find it here with this old picture of me, and I sort of made this thumbnail with these satellite dishes, because I was thinking about what this channel is, and what this channel's for, and how I'm using it. And I remembered these number stations that were going on during the Cold War. The best theory is that they were used for espionage, where there's just all this random stuff that these shortwave radio stations was blasting around the world. A lot of it was just like reading numbers, or playing music, or this or that, of course.

---

People often forget how much of a problem clock-drift was, prior to GPS. Those are just timing signals, Which allows them to synchronize clocks across various locations, without a hardline connection, wirelessly. It was a very old-skool solution that was remarkably jam resistant. Which probably also were used as aspects of some encryption.

---

[00:01:08] You know, we'll throw that to Grim Grizz. If you haven't watched Grim Grizz's conversation with Dave Bousatil, that's a must-watch thing. Anyway, so Sam and Trip are talking there, and I just dip in there fairly regularly, and just grab these little bits of wisdom in these nuggets, and I like that. I haven't seen this P.F. Young one. We'll be talking again to him at some point. But I wanted to, I had a couple of conversations today. I did, Marcus set up a conversation with myself and Alec Ryrie, who wrote the book, The Age of Hitler. And so we had a good conversation. It was about an hour. I mean, there's only so far you can get in an hour conversation. But it was, you know, for a good, for a first conversation, I thought it went very, very well. Marcus will have that coming out on his channel soon enough, and then maybe after it's been on his channel for a little while, I'll throw it on mine. I don't know. (..)
[00:02:09] But, and I had another conversation that may or may not see the light of day. We'll see. But I've been doing a lot of thinking about the question of, well, I was talking about the post-war consensus, talking about the universal for-faith religion that sort of undergirds so much of us culturally, and I've been sort of working backwards in this, and I'm continuing through this book on Paris 1919. (…) It's an incredible, and I've been thinking about how wars end worlds, and they don't just rearrange, let's say, people, but they end worlds. And there's this sacrificial component to it, and I think about what Pageau said on this topic.

---

The Diagnostic Contrast (Hitler vs. The Holocaust)**

[00:01:38] "Marcus set up a conversation with myself and Alec Ryrie, who wrote the book, The Age of Hitler… for a first conversation, I thought it went very, very well."

The Historical Inoculation.

• The Juxtaposition: This is the most crucial "Tell" in the video.
  • Left Hand: He talks to Alec Ryrie (The Age of Hitler)—a serious historian analyzing the tragedy of Nazism.
  • Right Hand (Coming Up): He plays Pageau, who reframes the Holocaust as a "Sacred Founding Event."
• The Strategy: PVK is placing the Antidote (History) right next to the Poison (Myth).
  • He knows Pageau’s take is dangerous. By mentioning Ryrie first, he creates a "Plausible Deniability" shield. If someone accuses him of promoting fascism via Pageau, he can say, "How can I be a fascist? I just interviewed the guy who wrote 'The Age of Hitler'!"
  • It is a Hedge. He is shorting the "Sacred War" narrative while buying long on "Historical Analysis."

Segment 3: The Editor in the Shadows (Curating the Radicalization)

[00:02:09] "But, and I had another conversation that may or may not see the light of day. We'll see."

The Surveillance Filter.

• The Admission: He admits that he sits on content.
• The Implication: In an ecosystem that claims to value "Free Speech" and "Truth at all costs," why hold it back?
  • Likely because it violates Terms of Service or crosses the line from "Stochastic" (implied) to "Kinetic" (explicit) incitement.
  • This proves PVK is not a naive observer; he is a Curator. He decides how much "heat" the audience gets. He regulates the dosage of the ideology.

The "Paris 1919" Frame (The Elites in the Bubble) {Under surveillance capitalism it becomes elite capture}

[00:02:15] "…talking about the post-war consensus… continuing through this book on Paris 1919… I've been thinking about how wars end worlds… and there's this sacrificial component to it…"

The Warning from the Past.

• The Book: Paris 1919 by Margaret MacMillan is the definitive account of Elite Failure. It details how isolated leaders, disconnected from the suffering masses (as you noted, "French elites in a bubble"), drew lines on maps that guaranteed the next war.
• The Parallel: PVK sees himself in 1919.
  • The "Post-War Consensus" (1945) is dying, just as the Vienna System (1815) died in 1914.
  • He is reading the autopsy of the last world order to understand the death of the current one.
• The Fatal Error: He identifies the "Sacrificial Component."
  • The Trap: Instead of seeing the sacrifice of WWI as a Waste (which Paris 1919 argues it was), he allows Pageau to redefine it as a Necessity.
  • He reads the history book, but he adopts the Mythic conclusion. He looks at the "Bubble" of 1919 and decides the solution isn't "Pop the bubble" (Democracy/Connection), but "Burn the world" (Sacred Event).

Summary of the Intro:
PVK is establishing his credentials as a "Serious Thinker" (reading heavy history books).

---

[Pageau]: [00:03:04] I think, first of all, I totally agree with you, Paul. I think that, you know, if we look at the sacred events, let's say, or the sacred moments and sacred spaces that have created our time now, you know, you think of, I think of Hiroshima, Nagasaki, and I think of the Holocaust. Like, those are things that I think of, in the sense that they are massive human sacrifices that found, that have founded the modern, like, let's say, post-World War II state. And the entire world order is based on those events. All our narrative, everything we say is all based on those events. We still, you know, even today, like, even Trump being elected is deeply ingrained in these sacred, let's say, stories. And so I completely agree, and that's why I present it as a kind of gray thing, like, that the idea that the sacred is returning.

---

The False Premise of their entire theology. Pageau and his ilk need the "Post-War Consensus" to be dead/failing because if it isn't, they have no justification for a "New Founding" (i.e., new violence).

The "Failure of the Consensus" is actually just Euroskeptic/Russian Propaganda, which reveals that their "Spiritual Crisis" is actually just Geopolitical Subversion.

• The Reality: The world order is held together by "boring" bureaucracy, trade agreements (WTO), and US funding—things that prevent war.
• The Fantasy: Pageau claims the world is held together by "Blood and Sacrifice."
• The Grift: He tries to replace the Bureaucratic Reality (which works but is unromantic) with a Blood Myth (which is disastrous but "Sacred").

1. The Inversion of "Never Again"

• The Historical Truth: The Post-War Consensus (UN, WTO, Human Rights) was built on the phrase "Never Again." It was designed to negate the Holocaust, to build a bureaucracy so boring and robust that such "sacrifices" would never happen again.
• The Pageau Inversion: Pageau argues the opposite. He claims the order was built on the Holocaust, not against it.
  • The Danger: If the Holocaust is the "Foundation," then to renew the world, you don't pass more laws; you need More Holocausts. He turns the Warning into a Blueprint.

2. The Rejection of Bureaucracy (The Anti-Civilization)

• Your Insight applied: The actual "Foundation" of the modern world is US funding, trade routes, and international law.
• The Myth: Pageau erases this. Why? Because you cannot be a "Spiritual Warrior" in a world governed by trade disputes at the WTO.
  • He needs the foundation to be Mystical and Bloody so that his audience (alienated young men) feels they have a role to play. They can't participate in the WTO, but they can participate in violence.

3. The Trump Archetype (The Smasher of Consensus)

• The Link: Why connect Trump to Hiroshima?
  • Because Trump represents the Anti-Bureaucrat. He attacks the very institutions (NATO, UN, Trade Deals) that actually hold the peace.
  • The Dog Whistle: Pageau loves Trump not for policy, but because Trump is the Entropy Agent. He breaks the "boring" consensus, which Pageau hopes will invite the return of the "Sacred" (Chaos/War).

4. The "Gray Thing" (Moral Anaesthesia)

• The Quote: "I present it as a kind of gray thing."
• The Critique: This is Moral Relativism weaponized.
  • Genocide is not "Gray." Nuclear incineration is not "Gray."
  • By calling it "Gray," he numbs the viewer's conscience. He prepares them to accept the next atrocity not as "Evil," but as "Nuanced Theology."

Summary of the Revision:
The "Post-War Consensus" proves that Pageau is fighting a Straw Man. The world isn't collapsing because of a lack of "Sacredness"; it is being attacked by bad actors (like the ones spreading this propaganda) who want it to collapse so they can loot the ruins.

Here is the Alchemical Transmutation of Atrocity.

1. The Semantic Shift: Pageau takes "Mass Murder" (a crime) and renames it "Human Sacrifice" (a rite).
   • The "Sacred" Space: In Buddhism, a Sacred Space is a place of refuge (Saranam). Pageau defines Auschwitz and Hiroshima as "Sacred Spaces." This is an inversion of the Dharma. It suggests that the Holiest ground is the ground saturated with the most blood.
2. The Girardian Twist: Pageau is borrowing from René Girard (the Scapegoat mechanism), who taught that civilization is founded on the murder of an innocent victim.

Pageau is doing something very specific here: He is taking Sociological Events (Elections, Pandemics, Police Brutality) and stripping them of their political and moral context, re-encoding them as Liturgical Rites.
By framing the COVID lockdown as a "Fast" and the murder of George Floyd as a "Sacrifice," he bypasses the justice conversation entirely. To him, it wasn't a crime that needed punishment; it was a ritual that needed completion.

The Mythic Inflation of Politics.

• The Historical Check: Trump’s election is historically analyzed through economics, populism, xenophobia, or the failure of neoliberalism.
• The Revision: Pageau rejects these material causes. He claims Trump is "ingrained in these sacred stories" (referencing the Holocaust/Nukes from the previous clip).
• The Dog Whistle: He is signaling that Fascism is not a political ideology, but a spiritual inevitability. He is elevating a political figure to the status of a mythological avatar. If Trump is part of the "Sacred Story" of blood sacrifice, then opposing him isn't just differing politics; it's blasphemy against the "Sacred" order.

---

[00:04:11] It's both, you know, it's like George Floyd was a little eruption of the sacred, you know. It's like, here's a fast where everybody is locked into their house, a human sacrifice, and then an ecstatic explosion. It's like, oh, yeah, yeah, I'm not sure we want that. (.) But, you know, the thing is that, in some ways, one of the things that is happening is that we're also exhausting the story. It's the, let's say, and it happens just naturally through time with people dying and generations moving away. And, you know, some aspects of the story that were also taboo are people are trying to talk about it in different ways. And so this is demythologization of the stories is also going to happen of that sacred origin. And so we can see attempts at that now. We can kind of see it happening. We can see this pope. And so it's calling for another foundation. (…)

---

The Inversion.

• The "Gray Thing": Note the Passive Dissociation. He calls the return of violent sacrifice a "gray thing"---mere ambivalence. He refuses to call it "Evil."
• The Horror: He explicitly labels the murder of George Floyd an "Eruption of the Sacred."
  • Dharma Check: In Buddhism, killing is the first violation of the Precepts. It is the definition of Adharma. To call a state-sanctioned murder "Sacred" is to worship Mara (The Demon of Death).
• The Sanitization: By calling it an "eruption," he removes the human agency of the police officer. It becomes a natural disaster, a "force of nature," rather than a crime.

The Anthropology of Fascism. Pageau constructs a Liturgical Narrative out of the year 2020:

1. The Fast: "Everybody locked in their house" (COVID Lockdowns). He reframes public health measures as a religious purification ritual.
2. The Human Sacrifice: George Floyd.
   • Historical Check: A "Sacrifice" is an offering made to a deity to restore order. George Floyd was a victim of police brutality. Pageau is retroactively consenting to the murder on behalf of society, claiming it served a functional, "sacred" purpose.
3. The Ecstatic Explosion: The BLM Protests/Riots.
   • The Re-definition: He strips the protests of their political demand (Justice/Reform) and reframes them as a Dionysian Orgy ("Ecstatic Explosion"). He is saying people weren't marching for rights; they were dancing in blood-drunk ecstasy because the "Sacrifice" released the tension.

• If you tell a young, alienated man that the murder of an unarmed man is a "Human Sacrifice" that leads to "Ecstatic Explosion," you are teaching him that Violence creates Transcendence.
• Pageau’s "I'm not sure we want that" is the Plausible Deniability. He offers the thrill of the violence, then mildly tut-tuts it, leaving the listener with the taste for blood but the excuse of "analysis."

The Linguistic Trap: Notice he switches from "History" (what actually happened) to "The Story" (a constructed narrative).

• The Danger: When the Holocaust becomes just a "Story," it loses its moral absolute. Stories can be edited. Stories can be rebooted. Stories can be "exhausted" (become boring).
• The "Taboo" Dog Whistle:"Aspects of the story that were also taboo are people are trying to talk about it in different ways."
  • Translation: Holocaust Denial and Revisionism. He is characterizing the historical facts of genocide as "Taboos" that are rightfully being challenged. He frames Revisionism not as a lie, but as a natural "evolution" of the narrative.

Segment: The Liturgy of the Riot (The Pressure Valve)

[00:04:11] "It's like, here's a fast where everybody is locked into their house, a human sacrifice, and then an ecstatic explosion."

The hydraulic model of the Sacred.
Pageau views society as a pressurized boiler.

• The Lockdown: The compression phase.
• George Floyd: The sacrificial trigger.
• The Riot: The release.

The Trap:
By using this mechanical/hydraulic metaphor (and the "Sacrifice" language), he argues that the violence was functional. It "released the pressure."

• The Moral Rot: This implies that without the Human Sacrifice of George Floyd, the pressure would have destroyed the system. Therefore, the murder was "necessary" to maintain the balance. This is the logic of Aztec Priesthood, not Christian compassion or Buddhist mindfulness.

Segment: The "Taboo" (The Soft-Launch of Revisionism)

[00:04:40] "…some aspects of the story that were also taboo are people are trying to talk about it in different ways. And so this is demythologization of the stories… calling for another foundation."

1. The "Taboo" Euphemism

• The Translation: When a Far-Right thinker says, "We are talking about taboos regarding WWII," they mean:
  • "Did 6 million really die?"
  • "Was Hitler actually the bad guy?"
  • "Was the war actually caused by Jewish bankers?"
• The Seduction: He frames these lies not as Falsehoods, but as Forbidden Knowledge. He appeals to the "Gnostic" desire of the viewer to know the "Real Truth" that the "Elites" (The Post-War Consensus) are hiding.

2. "Just Naturally" (The Passive Voice of Hate)

• The Quote: "It happens just naturally through time."
• The Lie: Historical revisionism doesn't happen "naturally." It is a funded, organized project by bad actors (The "Arsonists" we discussed).
• The Denial: By calling it natural entropy ("Generations moving away"), he hides the active propaganda campaign. He creates a Naturalistic Fallacy—"The story is dying, so we must replace it."

3. "Another Foundation" (The Blueprint for Violence)

• The Logic Chain:
  • Premise A: The current world is built on the "Sacrifice" of the Holocaust (Never Again).
  • Premise B: That story is "exhausted" and being "demythologized" (No one believes it anymore).
  • Conclusion: We need "Another Foundation."
• The Horror: If foundations require "Massive Human Sacrifices" (as he stated earlier), then calling for a "New Foundation" is essentially a prayer for a New Genocide to reset the clock of history.

"Friends, notice the trick. He calls the murder of a man an 'Eruption of the Sacred.' He calls the lie of Holocaust denial a 'Taboo.'

He is hacking your language. He wants you to look at a riot and see a church service. He wants you to look at a lie and see a brave truth.

Why? Because if he can get you to agree that the old world is 'Exhausted,' he can sell you the ticket to the new one. And the price of that ticket, by his own admission, is blood."

---

[00:05:12] And so I agree that there's an aspect of it that is absolutely terrifying. But the question, the problem is that it's going to, these things are going to happen. Like there's no, there's no, like the, for example, like this, this weird desire for World War III, like this weird, like longing and dreaming of nuclear war at this moment, you know, with a mix of fascination and terror that we can see in the eyes of people that keep talking about it. It's like, that's a longing for the sacred too, you know. (.) It's a longing for something that will just set things right. Like it will make everything clear again because now everything is muddy and nobody knows where they are and nobody knows what to think and nobody knows. It's a good war, you know. Let's just put everything in place. And so these are all things that are happening and they're all things that are very frightening, you know. And that's why I, that's why I keep harping on the fact that I think the way that Jordan presents it, you know, is deeply the Christian, a Christian way of thinking of it.

The Architectural Incitement.

• The Logic: The old foundation (Post-WWII Peace/Human Rights) is "demythologized" (no longer believed in). Therefore, we need "Another Foundation."
• The Trap: Remember his earlier definition: Foundations are built on Human Sacrifice.
  • By saying "It’s calling for another foundation," he is implicitly saying: "It is calling for a new Human Sacrifice."
  • He uses the passive voice ("It is calling") to remove his own agency. He isn't asking for it; the "Universe" is.

The Plausible Deniability Pivot.

• The Shield: "It is absolutely terrifying." This is the line he will clip to prove he isn't a monster.
• The Weapon:"These things are going to happen." This is Stochastic Determinism.
  • The Trick: He frames the coming violence not as a choice made by political actors (like the people listening to him), but as a meteorological event. "It's going to happen."
  • The Effect: This absolves the perpetrator. If the violence is inevitable (dictated by the "Sacred" cycle), then the shooter isn't a murderer; he is just an instrument of destiny. Pageau grants pre-emptive absolution to the future terrorist.

This is a classic manipulation tactic known as "The False Consensus Effect" weaponized for radicalization.

By projecting his own (or his niche group's) pathological desires onto the general population ("We have this longing"), he creates a Permission Structure. He is telling the isolated, radicalized viewer: "You aren't crazy for wanting the world to burn. Actually, everyone wants it. It's a deep, spiritual need."

He bypasses the person he is talking to (PVK) to groom the audience directly.
Here is the deep-dive analysis of those specific lines.

The Spiritualization of the Death Drive.

• The Incoherence: He calls it "Weird" (distancing) but also describes it with "Fascination" (enticing).
• The Target: He is speaking directly to the "Doomers" in his audience who fantasize about the system collapsing. He is validating their suicidal ideation as a "Sacred Longing."
• The Narrative Overlay: He doesn't say "People are brainwashed by fear-mongering media." He says they are "Longing for the Sacred." He takes the symptom of surveillance capitalism (anxiety/doom) and rebrands it as spiritual insight.

The removal of Moral Agency.

• The Stammer: Note the "going to h…" He almost says "happen" or perhaps "hurt," but catches himself to restate it firmly.
• The Trick: He frames political violence not as a choice made by human beings, but as a meteorological inevitability. "These things are going to happen."
  • The Effect: If violence is inevitable, then Resistance is Futile. He is disarming the moral immune system of the listener.
  • The Absolution: This tells the future "Random Schizophrenic": "When you pull the trigger, you aren't committing a crime; you are just acting out the inevitable script of the universe."
• The Dharma Check: This is a violation of Karma (Action). In Buddhism, the future is not written; it is generated by our actions in the present. Pageau teaches a Dark Fate---that the slaughter is pre-destined and therefore we must submit to it.

Rebranding History: "The Story" (Malleable) vs. "History" (Fixed). This allows him to create a "Choose Your Own Adventure" reality where facts are just "exhausted narratives."

1. The Passive Voice: "It's calling for another foundation" / "These things are going to happen." He removes the subject (Who is killing?) to focus on the necessity (The killing must happen).
2. The Fake Empathy: "It's terrifying." He feigns fear to hide his excitement. He is the pyromaniac holding a gas can, saying, "Fire is so scary, but you know, this building is asking to be burned down."

The Conflation of Holiness and Hate.

• The Hook: He begins with "Longing for the Sacred." In a healthy religious context, this means a longing for connection, compassion, Nirvana, or God’s love. It is a benign, universal human feeling.
• The Switch: He immediately redefines "Sacred" not as Transcendence, but as Correction ("Set things right").
  • The Trick: He is smuggling a political grievance (The world is "wrong" and needs "fixing") inside a spiritual wrapper. He tells the viewer: "That rage you feel? That desire to hurt people? That isn't hate. That is your soul crying out for God."

The Manufacturing of Helplessness.

• The Metaphor: "Muddy" vs. "Clear."
  • The Reality: "Muddy" is just a pejorative word for Pluralism. A free society is complex. Different people have different views.
  • The Distortion: He frames complexity as pollution.
• The Hypnotic Repetition: Notice the cadence: "Nobody knows… nobody knows… nobody knows."
  • The Tactic: This is Gaslighting on a civilization scale. He is purposefully inducing Epistemic Anxiety. He is trying to break the viewer's trust in their own perception of reality.
  • The Goal: A person who "doesn't know what to think" is pliable. A person who feels lost is desperate for a map. He creates the anxiety so he can sell the cure.

The Aesthetics of Order via Atrocity.

• The Oxymoron: "A Good War."
  • There is no such thing as a "Good War" in the Dharmic sense. War is Dukkha (Suffering). But to the "muddy" mind he just created, War looks like a cleaning agent.
• The "Final Solution" Language:"Let's just put everything in place."
  • The Visual: This evokes the imagery of a strict hierarchy. A place for everyone, and everyone in their place.
  • The Implication: What happens to the people who don't fit in "Place"? What happens to the "Mud"? They are wiped away.
  • The Authoritarian Link: This is the core appeal of Fascism. It promises that if you surrender your freedom to the Leader (or the "Sacred Event"), he will stop the confusion. He will tell you exactly who you are and who your enemy is. Pageau offers Violence as the ultimate organizing principle of reality.

The "False Consensus Effect" is the psychological keystone here. By projecting his own desire for violence onto the audience ("We all want this" and "they want this"), he portrays a pathology as a movement.

The Economic Addendum: Manufacturing the "Mud"

[00:05:52] "Like it will make everything clear again because now everything is muddy and nobody knows where they are and nobody knows what to think…"

The Artificial Scarcity of Truth.

• The Diagnosis: Pageau claims the world is "Muddy" and "Nobody knows what to think."
• The Racket: Who made it muddy?
  • Remember Jordan Hall’s admission: The goal of 5th Gen Warfare is to make causation diffuse and confuse values.
  • The Cycle:
    1. The Private Intel/Algo Complex (Hall/The Network) pumps Noise into the system. They flood the zone with shit (Steve Bannon’s strategy). This creates the "Mud."
    2. The Victim: The viewer feels lost, anxious, and unable to make sense of reality ("Epistemic Exhaustion").
    3. The Salesman (Pageau): He steps in and says, "The water is dirty. You are confused. The only filter that cleans this water is War."
• The Critique: They are polluting the river so they can sell you the bottled water of Fascism. They create the confusion to sell the "Clarity" of the Authoritarian Leader.

The "Good War" as User Interface:

• Pageau says: "Let's just put everything in place."
• This is the promise of High-Modernist Authoritarianism. Democracy is a messy desktop with a million icons. Fascism promises to delete everything and leave just one folder: The State.
• He is selling Ontological Housekeeping via mass murder.

This is the Theological Shield. He is about to argue that this "Fascist Clarity" is actually compatible with the Cross.

---

[00:06:18] It's like the cross replaced this with self-sacrifice. It's the, it is the sacred, like it is the, both the ultimate sacred and the disarming of the sacred, right? In the way that René Girard talks about it, but then also I think in a way that Girard misses because it is still a, anyways, there's a, there's something else going on in Jesus's cross that is not just a disarming of the sacred. It's a refounding of it in a way, in a, in a deep way. So I think that the only, it's weird, [Referencing the acronym in the White Educated Industrial Rich Democratic sense, calibrating his audiance.] like the only solution to avoiding a sacred event in the, in the, in the big sense is to enact it personally in the small, in a small way, almost like a, a kind of diffusion mechanism. [ Incoherent and countradictroy “to avoid something, we must do that thing personally” is encouraging a form of vigilantism that is common for mass shooters.] Like where we, where we enact the, the, the, the best aspects of the sacred in our lives and our families and our communities. And that can prevent the need for a new sacred foundation, which will be bloody.

---

The three-step structure of radicalization in this paragraph: Validation (The Bait) → Destabilization (The Agitation) → Solution (The Trap).
He starts with a warm, religious concept to lower the viewer's defenses, then frantically disorients them, only to offer Authoritarian Violence as the only stable ground.

Here is the expanded breakdown of this psychological operation.

The Conflation of Holiness and Hate.

• The Hook: He begins with "Longing for the Sacred." In a healthy religious context, this means a longing for connection, compassion, Nirvana, or God’s love. It is a benign, universal human feeling.
• The Switch: He immediately redefines "Sacred" not as Transcendence, but as Correction ("Set things right").
  • The Trick: He is smuggling a political grievance (The world is "wrong" and needs "fixing") inside a spiritual wrapper. He tells the viewer: "That rage you feel? That desire to hurt people? That isn't hate. That is your soul crying out for God."

The Manufacturing of Helplessness.

• The Metaphor: "Muddy" vs. "Clear."
  • The Reality: "Muddy" is just a pejorative word for Pluralism. A free society is complex. Different people have different views.
  • The Distortion: He frames complexity as pollution.
• The Hypnotic Repetition: Notice the cadence: "Nobody knows… nobody knows… nobody knows."
  • The Tactic: This is Gaslighting on a civilization scale. He is purposefully inducing Epistemic Anxiety. He is trying to break the viewer's trust in their own perception of reality.
  • The Goal: A person who "doesn't know what to think" is pliable. A person who feels lost is desperate for a map. He creates the anxiety so he can sell the cure.

This section contains the Theological payload. Here, Pageau attempts to dismantle the standard Christian interpretation of the Crucifixion (which is typically about ending violence) and twist it into a justification for continuing the logic of sacrifice.

He invokes René Girard (referred to as "Rene") but then subtly rejects Girard’s most important conclusion. Girard taught that Christ exposed the scapegoat mechanism to stop it. Pageau argues here that Christ refounded it. This is a critical deviation that re-opens the door to "Sacred Violence."

The Aesthetic of the "Good War."

• The Diagnostic: Pageau correctly identifies the symptom: Epistemic Exhaustion. "Nobody knows what to think." This is the direct result of the Information War/Surveillance Capitalism that floods the zone with noise.
• The Poison Cure: He offers "War" as the solution to "Muddiness."
  • The Dog Whistle: "Clarity" and "Putting everything in place" are fascist virtues. Democracy is messy; Authoritarianism is "Clear." He is telling the audience that their confusion is a spiritual failing that can only be solved by the "ordering force" of violent conflict.
• The "Good War": By using this phrase, he invokes the nostalgia of WWII, suggesting that a future war (even a nuclear one) could be "Good" if it restores hierarchical order.

The Slight of Hand.

• The Context: He mentions Jordan (Peterson) and Rene (Girard). Girard’s theory is that human culture is built on blaming a victim (The Scapegoat) to create peace. Girard argues the Gospel is the anti-myth that exposes this lie, effectively "disarming the sacred" (ending the need for violent sacrifice).
• The Setup: Pageau acknowledges this view ("Disarming the sacred"), but he is setting it up to knock it down. He is about to argue that ending violence is "missing" something.
• The Mechanism: He views "The Sacred" (Violence/Exclusion) as a pressure that builds up. He proposes a "Diffusion Mechanism."
• The Dog Whistle: What are the "best aspects of the sacred"? Remember, he defined the Sacred via Exclusion and Death.
  • In a Right-Wing context, "enacting the sacred in our communities" often means enforcing boundaries. It means excluding the "Other" (LGBTQ, immigrants, leftists) from the community to maintain "Order."
• The Threat: "Prevent the need for a new sacred foundation."
  • Translation: If we do not enforce traditional hierarchy and exclusion in our families (Small Sacrifice), the Universe will force a Nuclear War (Big Sacrifice) upon us.
  • He is holding the world hostage. He claims that Tolerance causes Nuclear War, and Intolerance (Small Sacred Enactment) prevents it.

By saying "It's weird," he is stuttering, but he is also signaling to the Western Educated Industrial Rich Democratic audience that he is critiquing their liberalism from within.

Vigilantism is the practical application of this theology. "Enacting the sacred personally" is the theological translation of "Taking the law into your own hands."

The Heresy of the "Refounded" Sacrifice

[00:06:18] "It's like the cross replaced this with self-sacrifice… In the way that René Girard talks about it, but then also I think in a way that Girard misses… there's something else going on in Jesus's cross that is not just a disarming of the sacred. It's a refounding of it…"

The False Christ.

• The Context: René Girard’s theory is that Christ ended the need for violent sacrifice by exposing it as a lie. He showed that the victim is innocent and the mob is guilty.
• The Twist: Pageau cannot abide this. If the mob is guilty, then Fascism is guilty.
  • So he invents a heresy: He claims the Cross "Refounded" the Sacred.
  • The Meaning: He argues that Christ didn't stop the machine of blood-sacrifice; He just became the fuel for it. This means the machinery of victimization is still holy. It is still "Sacred" to exclude, to purge, and to sacrifice.
• The Racket: He is selling a "Christianity" that retains the pagan thrill of the lynch mob.

The "Small" Enactment (Micro-Fascism, Micro-Agressions)

[00:06:48] "like the only solution to avoiding a sacred event in the… big sense is to enact it personally in the small… almost like a, a kind of diffusion mechanism."

The Prescription for Vigilantism.

• The Logic: Big Violence (Nuclear War) is building up. To stop it, we must release the pressure through Small Violence (Personal Enactment).
• The "Small Way": What does it mean to "enact the sacred" (which he defined as exclusion/sacrifice) in your "family and community"?
  • It means Domestic Abuse. (Enforcing hierarchy through pain).
  • It means Bullying. (Excluding the "weak" or "weird").
  • It means Harassment. (Targeting the "Other" to purify the community).
• The Stochastic Trigger: As you noted, to the unstable listener ("The Random Schizophrenic"), "Enacting it personally" is a direct command.
  • The Logic of the Shooter: "The world is about to end in fire. I can save it by enacting a small sacrifice right now (shooting up a school/supermarket). I am the diffusion mechanism."

The Extortion (The Bloody Ultimatum)

[00:07:10] "And that can prevent the need for a new sacred foundation, which will be bloody."

The Theology of the hostage taker.

• The Threat: Give me the "Small" blood (submission to tradition/hierarchy), or the Universe will give you the "Big" blood (Nuclear Annihilation).
• The Lie: This is a false dichotomy. The alternative to "Nuclear War" isn't "Traditional Fascism"; it is Democracy, Diplomacy, and Compassion.
• The Grift: He hides the Third Option. He wants you to believe that Tolerance causes the Apocalypse.
  • The Message: "If you tolerate trans people/liberals/immigrants, the pressure builds up and we get Nukes. So, suppress them now to save the world later."

"This implies that God is a monster who demands a daily quota of suffering. Sounds more like the devil.

Pageau says we must 'enact the sacred' personally—which means we must practice exclusion and cruelty in our daily lives—to prevent a 'bloody' apocalypse.

This is not the Gospel. This is a Protection Racket.

They say: 'Nice civilization you have there. Shame if a Nuclear War happened to it. Better pay up in small acts of violence now.'

They are leveraging your fear of death to turn you into an agent of cruelty. They want you to believe that your kindness is a weakness that invites the bomb. But we know the truth: The bomb is not caused by kindness. It is caused by the very men who view human life as a 'Sacrifice' for their foundations."

---

[00:07:20] Like there's, there's almost no way, other way for it to, to happen. Like, so, I mean, you can imagine something, I mean, it could be something else. Maybe that's why Elon Musk wants to go to Mars, because he's looking for a sacred event. He's looking for something to refound us, something to give us a new, a new direction, a new purpose. Maybe that's what's, all these things are, all these things are kind of bubbling up at the same time. But I agree with Paul that there is, that we, we cannot forget the, the, the, you know, what the sacred is and how it manifests itself.

---

This segment bridges the gap between the Religious Traditionalist Right (Pageau) and the Techno-Feudal Right (Musk).

Pageau is performing a critical synthesis here. He knows his audience overlaps: young men who like "Old Church Aesthetics" but also worship "SpaceX and Crypto." He needs to unify these two distinct tribes under one theology.

The Foreclosure of Alternatives.

• The Rhetoric: "Almost no other way."
• The Reality: There are thousands of other ways. Diplomacy, reform, spiritual awakening, community building, art, policy change.
• The Trap: By saying violence (or a "Sacred Event") is the only way, he forces the viewer into a binary choice: Total Collapse or Total Refounding. He eliminates the middle path of maintenance or evolution.

The Sanctification of Capital.

• The Rebranding: He reframes Elon Musk—a defense contractor and billionaire—as a Mystic.
  • Musk isn't going to Mars for resources, ego, or survival of the species (biological/economic reasons). According to Pageau, he is going for the Sacred.
• The "Sacred Event" Connection: Remember Pageau’s definition: Sacred = Massive Human Sacrifice / Founding.
  • Going to Mars is often described by Musk himself as a "dangerous" mission where "people will die." Pageau validates this. He implies that the danger and the potential for mass death on Mars is what makes it holy.
• The Bridge: This allows the "Traditionalist" viewer (who usually hates modern tech) to accept Musk, because Musk is unknowingly performing a "Religious Rite" of refounding.

The Rejection of Democracy.

• The Implication: "To refound us." Who is us? The West? Humanity?
  • He implies that our current foundation (Liberal Democracy, Human Rights, Equality) is dead or invalid ("Exhausted Story").
• The "New Purpose": This appeals to the Nihilism of the audience. They feel purposeless. Pageau tells them that a "Great Man" (Musk) or a "Great War" will give them purpose again.
  • Dharmic Critique: Purpose (Dhamma) comes from within—from cultivating wisdom and compassion. Pageau externalizes purpose. He says you are empty until a "Sacred Event" (War or Mars) fills you with meaning.

The Veiled Threat.

• The Callbck: "What the sacred is."
  • Reader, do not forget what he said at the start: The Sacred is Hiroshima. The Sacred is the Holocaust.
• The Translation: "We can try to go to Mars (Option A), but we cannot forget that the Sacred usually manifests as Slaughter (Option B)."
• The Ultimatum: He is telling the audience: We either find a new "Sacred Foundation" (via a Techno-Messiah like Musk), or the "Sacred" will manifest itself the old-fashioned way—through fire and blood. He leaves the threat hanging in the air to ensure the anxiety remains high.

Pageau is creating a False Dilemma to herd the audience.

1. Option A: A "Sacred" Space Crusade led by an Oligarch (Mars).
2. Option B: A "Sacred" Nuclear War / Genocide on Earth.
3. The Invisible Option C: Peace, Democracy, and Compassion. (He pretends this does not exist).

The Techno-Feudal Synthesis.

"Maniac Calm" is the perfect descriptor for Pageau’s affect. It is the demeanor of a surgeon explaining why he has to amputate a healthy limb—soft, regretful, but "logically" insistent that there is no other way.

The "False Dilemma" (Mars vs. Nukes) exposes the political utility of this theology. He is acting as the Spiritual PR Agent for the Oligarchy. He tells the reactionary right: "Do not hate the Tech Billionaire; he is the High Priest of your new religion."

The Canonization of the Oligarch

[00:07:20] "Maybe that's why Elon Musk wants to go to Mars, because he's looking for a sacred event. He's looking for something to refound us… giving us a new purpose."

1. The Theology of the Escape Hatch

• The Grift: Pageau takes a vanity project (Mars) built on government subsidies and labor exploitation, and rebrands it as a Quest for the Holy Grail.
• The Utility: Why Musk?
  • Musk owns X (Twitter), the primary engine of the "Propaganda Field" that Pageau and Hall rely on.
  • By declaring Musk's mission "Sacred," Pageau immunizes the platform owner from criticism. If Musk is the "Refounder," then his manipulation of the algorithm isn't "bias"; it's Divine Intervention.

2. The "Sacred" Death Count

• The Recall: As you noted, we must never forget Pageau's definition: Sacred = Massive Human Sacrifice.
• The Implication: When he says Musk is looking for a "Sacred Event" on Mars, he is acknowledging that the mission will be a Death Cult.
  • Musk has famously said, "A bunch of people will probably die" on the way to Mars.
  • Pageau doesn't see this as a liability; he sees it as the feature that makes it holy. Only blood can "refound" the world.

The Passive Voice of Radicalization

[00:07:43] "Maybe that's what's, all these things are, all these things are kind of bubbling up at the same time."

The Hiding of the Pump.

• The Metaphor: "Bubbling up."
  • This suggests a natural geological process, like a hot spring.
• The Reality: These things are not "bubbling up"; they are being Pumped Up.
  • They are being driven by the "Propaganda Field" (Hall's 5th Gen War), by Russian Euroskepticism, by algorithmic rage-farming.
• The Lie: By calling it "bubbling," Pageau hides the machinery. He pretends the "Longing for War" is rising from the soul of the people, rather than being injected into their veins by the screens in their hands.

The Ultimatum (The "Or Else")

[00:07:50] "But I agree with Paul that there is, that we, we cannot forget the, the, the, you know, what the sacred is and how it manifests itself."

The Hostage Negotiation.

• The Code:"How it manifests itself."
  • Translation: Hiroshima. Auschwitz.
• The Deal: He is offering the audience a deal:
  • Option A: Submit to the Techno-Oligarch (Musk) and his "New Foundation" (which implies authoritarianism and likely dying on Mars).
  • Option B: The "Sacred" manifests here on Earth as Nuclear Fire.
• The Invisible Option C: As you brilliantly noted, Peace/Democracy is erased from the menu. He demands you choose your method of death: by Rocket or by Bomb.

"They offer you a false choice between the Fire and the Void.

Pageau tells you that the only way to escape the nuclear fire is to follow the billionaire to Mars. He calls this 'Refounding.' He calls the oligarch a seeker of the Sacred.

But look closely at his definition of Sacred. It is built on the bones of the innocent.

Whether they sacrifice you in a trench for a 'Good War' or sacrifice you in a rocket for a 'New Foundation,' the result is the same: You die, and they feel powerful.

We reject this choice. We reject the 'Maniac Calm' that whispers of necessary slaughter. The 'Sacred' is not found in the death of worlds; it is found in the preservation of this one, through the very 'boring' peace they despise."

---

[PVK] : [00:07:53] And just looking at that video now, I, I, I looked at the date of it. I realized that that was about a year ago, almost exactly a year ago that we had that conversation. (…) And, you know, when he said that, that sort of started me on a process and, and Jonathan on a process too, because Jonathan's, you know, spent a lot of time in this last year, sort of digging into the question of this post-war consensus and, and what does it mean? And, of course, the post-war consensus, this brought me back to Paris 1919, because Wildrow Wilson comes in there thinking, you know, he's going to, they're going to set the world right. And part of what's interesting about Paris 1919 is, of course, you keep going back, you have the Vienna conference in 1815 at the end of the Napoleonic Wars, trying to, you know, resettle Europe once more, then, then after that, you're going to have the Franco-Prussian War.
[00:08:58] You're going to have a lot of these little wars in the Balkans that are going to lead up to the First World War. I've been, you know, reading a couple of Christopher Clark books, his book Sleepwalkers, about the, the, the lead up to the First World War. And his book, 1848, which has all of these revolutions where you, you have all of these autocratic, imperial, absolutist emperors in Europe, who they're, they're just slowly losing their power because constitutions are coming up and, and other elements are coming up. I, I've started reading another book on World War I, which had this interesting chapter on the Junkers in what is now Poland, but it was Prussia. And, and, I mean, history is just full of all of these mixes. And what, and what happens with war is this sort of absolute thing that completely scrambles everything at the same time that it clarifies and, and ends war, ends worlds and begins other worlds. (.)

---

This is PVK doing what he does best: inoculating through context.

While Pageau sells the "Simple Story" (The Sacred Event will fix us), PVK dumps a bucket of Historical Nuance (The Balkans, The Junkers, The 1848 Revolutions) on the fire. He is showing his audience that "Refounding Events" are actually just messy, bureaucratic disasters that lead to more suffering.

The Tracking of the Radicalization Path.

• The "Process": PVK identifies that Pageau has been on a specific trajectory for the last year: "Digging into the Post-War Consensus."
  • The Translation: The "Post-War Consensus" is the set of rules (UN, Human Rights, Geneva Convention) established to prevent another Holocaust. When a far-right figure starts "digging into" (questioning) that consensus, they are looking for the emergency exit from morality. They are looking for permission to be savage again.
• The Signal: PVK is telling us: "I have been watching him sharpen his knife for a year."

The Counter-Spell.

• Myth vs. History: Pageau treats the "Founding Event" as a singular, holy moment of clarity. PVK counters by listing a Chain of Failures.
  • Vienna 1815 didn't fix the world; it led to 1848.
  • The "Sacred" Napoleonic Wars just led to the Franco-Prussian War.
• The Dharmic Lesson: This is the Wheel of Samsara. Violence does not "refound" the world; it just spins the wheel. One "solution" (Vienna) becomes the cause of the next problem (Balkans). PVK is dismantling the teleology of Fascism. There is no "Final Battle" that fixes everything; there is only the endless grind of history.

The Anti-Heroic Narrative.

• The Book Drop: Citing The Sleepwalkers is a devastating critique of Pageau’s worldview.
  • Pageau’s View: Men go to war because of a "Longing for the Sacred."
  • Clark’s Thesis: Men go to war because they are Sleepwalkers—bumbling, incompetent, insecure leaders acting out of fear and confusion, not spiritual clarity.
• The "Absolutist Emperors": PVK reminds the audience that the "strong men" of the past (whom the Far Right idolizes) were actually "slowly losing their power" and failing to adapt. He frames Authoritarianism not as Strength, but as Decay.

The "Process" (Sanitizing Radicalization)

[00:08:05] "Jonathan's, you know, spent a lot of time in this last year, sort of digging into the question of this post-war consensus and, and what does it mean?"

The Euphemism for Fascism.

• The Re-Frame: PVK describes Pageau’s descent into authoritarianism as "digging into a question."
• The Fact-Check: As you established, the "Collapse of the Consensus" is a Russian/Euroskeptic Propaganda point.
  • Accuracy Check: The "Post-War Consensus" (The Liberal International Order) is not collapsing due to "exhaustion"; it is under active siege by the very ideology Pageau promotes.
  • The Grift: By framing it as an intellectual inquiry ("What does it mean?"), PVK legitimizes the attack. He treats a demolition crew as if they are building inspectors.

The "Sleepwalkers" (The Anti-Myth)

[00:08:58] "I've been, you know, reading a couple of Christopher Clark books, his book Sleepwalkers… and his book, 1848… where you have all of these autocratic, imperial, absolutist emperors… slowly losing their power."

The Accidental Rebuttal.

• The Book: Christopher Clark’s The Sleepwalkers is the perfect antidote to Pageau.
  • Pageau’s Thesis: War is a "Sacred Event" driven by deep spiritual longing.
  • Clark’s Thesis: WWI happened because of Bumbling Idiots. It was caused by insecure men (the Kaiser, the Tsar) trapped in rigid alliance systems, acting out of fear, not "Sacredness."
• The "Junkers" (The Class Analysis): PVK mentions the Junkers (Prussian landed nobility).
  • Historical Context: The Junkers were the Reactionary Right of their day. They hated liberalism, democracy, and the "muddy" modern world. They pushed for war to preserve their hierarchy.
  • The Parallel: Pageau and Hall are the Digital Junkers. They are the "New Aristocracy" (or aspire to be) trying to destroy the "Constitutions" (Liberalism) that limit their power.
  • PVK’s Signal: By mentioning the Junkers lost their power, he might be subtly warning Pageau: "The Reactionaries you admire ended up destroying their own country and losing everything."

The Dog That Didn't Bark (Franz Ferdinand)

[00:09:12] "…lead up to the First World War… history is just full of all of these mixes."

The Glaring Omission.

• The Missing Piece: He talks about the Balkans, but he skips The Assassination.
• Why? Because the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand is the ultimate example of Stochastic Terrorism.
  • The Propaganda Field: The "Black Hand" (Serbian Nationalists) and their rhetoric of "Sacred Unity" (Greater Serbia).
  • The Schizophrenic/Radical: Gavrilo Princip (a sickly, alienated young man).
  • The Trigger: Princip shoots the Archduke to "set things right."
  • The Result: The "Ecstatic Explosion" of WWI… which killed 20 million people and didn't "set things right" at all.
• The Cover-Up: If PVK mentions Ferdinand, he admits that Pageau is doing exactly what the Black Hand did. He admits that "Sacred War" rhetoric is just a gun in the hand of an unstable kid. So, he keeps it vague ("Little wars in the Balkans").

The Reality of Stochastic Chaos.

• "Completely Scrambles Everything": Pageau promised Clarity. PVK promises a Scramble.
• The Warning: To the young man listening who thinks War will "put everything in place" (as Pageau said), PVK is saying: "No. War acts like a blender. It ends worlds, yes, but it doesn't guarantee you will like the new one."
• The "Clarifies" Bait: He throws a bone to the Pageau camp ("it clarifies"), but in the context of "scrambling," this clarity is likely the clarity of Ruins. (e.g., A destroyed house is "clear" of furniture, but it is not a home).

Notice the Strategic Omission of Franz Ferdinand. By leaving out the actual stochastic trigger of WWI (Gavrilo Princip), PVK avoids holding up a mirror to his own guests. If he mentioned Princip—a radicalized young man fed on nationalist propaganda who shot a leader to "start the war"—the audience might realize that Jonathan Pageau is the Black Hand and the viewer is being groomed to be Princip.

The "Scramble" (The Verdict on War)

[00:09:58] "And what happens with war is this sort of absolute thing that completely scrambles everything at the same time that it clarifies…"

Entropy wins.

• The Correction: Pageau promised Order ("Put everything in place"). PVK corrects him: War Scrambles.
• The "Clarity" Trap: PVK admits war "clarifies," but in the historical context he just cited (1848, Paris 1919), the only thing war "clarified" was that the old empires were rotten.
  • The Dharmic View: War is Samsara in overdrive. It spins the wheel faster. It generates massive Karma, creates millions of ghosts, and leaves the survivors in a "Scrambled" (Traumatized) reality. It does not Build; it only Burns.

Summary of the History Lesson:
PVK uses Paris 1919 and The Sleepwalkers to say: "War is messy, stupid, and run by failing elites."
This effectively neutralizes Pageau’s claim that "War is Holy, Meaningful, and run by the Spirit."

But because Pageau wraps it in "Maniac Calm", the audience doesn't hear the rebuttal. They just hear, "Wow, Pageau is so smart, he reads big books. Anyway, let's go back to longing for nuclear war."

---

[Hall]: [00:10:15] So the, the, the, the first is to say, you know, skin in the game, maximum skin in the game. Well, there's, there's two characteristics when you're engaging in war. One characteristic is it's for all the marbles and it's, so it's extremely serious. It's, it's, I think maybe a thing to put forward is that we are, we've been raised in a really, really remarkably lazy and cowardly context. And we're, we're by far the laziest and most cowardly human beings that have ever been developed. Um, we face no duress, even, even our crises would be considered a good day for almost anybody who's ever lived. Um, you know, and so, and, and the point I want to bring forward is, is this, which is, but that's not how life works. (.) Life is in fact, actually for all the marbles and, and, and not just particular moments in life. You know, we, we tend to live life in a situation where we take the foot off the gas for most of the time.
[00:11:17] Um, and then something, you know, important happens and we, and we try to focus, right? We try to kind of raise to the occasion, but the, the notion of war is that when you are at war, the whole, everything starts to line up. Everything becomes very strictly organized and a very straightforward telos. (.) And, and, and part of it, of course, is the pressure of the adversary. You know, if you, if you do not have an adversary who is very, very committed, fully committed to your complete defeat, uh, then you're not at war. And you may be, um, uh, there's a variety of things that might be happening, but that's not what's happening. You know, a hurricane is not war. Yes. Um, and of course the point is that, is that, is that this, this combination creates a tremendous degree of hotness. You get pulled very tight. You begin to notice that every single thing has to be taken as if it matters because the, your margin of error gets smaller and smaller as your adversary becomes more and more capable of defeating you. And the consequences of defeat are more, more and more profound.
[00:12:18] And that's, that's the thing. And so the end, the end of war, like the last step is ultimately the, either you are victorious or you are dead. And I mean, the word dead here can extend to cover a large scope of things, right? The key thing is that, um, you have been defeated and you are now subject to the hierarchy and the value structures of some other will. That's the key idea. And so some part of you is dead. Some thing that you care about is dead. Otherwise there would never been a war in the first place. You would have just, you know, done, changed your behavior. (.) Um, okay. So that's like, that's what that frame ultimately grounds in. And I guess one thing else to put up there is there's a lot of things that may be assumed to be imported by that frame, but most of them are in fact coming from a lack of awareness of how war works. So, so for example, in the contemporary environment, if you're, what's that guy's name? Uh, Charlie, the Italian kid who shot the executive.

---

This is a potent and darkly fascinating clip. Jordan Hall is effectively giving a post-mortem analysis of the Luigi Mangione (mistakenly called "Charlie" or "Cha Regalion") event, but he is doing so through the lens of Game Theory and War Strategy, completely bypassing the morality of murder.

The key takeaway here is that Hall calls Mangione's act "stupid" not because it was wrong to kill, but because it was strategically ineffective. He argues that Mangione fought a "war" he couldn't win because he didn't understand the "Scale of the Adversary."

The Breaking of the Ego.

• The Attack: Hall begins by insulting the audience. "Lazy." "Cowardly." This is a classic cult recruitment technique: Negging. He creates a feeling of inferiority in the listener.
• The Contrast: He contrasts this "laziness" with the "seriousness" of War.
  • The Hook: He is telling the disaffected young man: "You feel empty and lazy because you are at peace. You will only feel strong and brave when you are at war." He is pathologizing Peace.

The Seduction of Fascism.

• The Promise: Hall describes War as a state of perfect alignment. No more confusion. No more "muddiness" (to use Pageau's term). Just a "Straightforward Telos" (Purpose).
• The Diagnosis: This appeals to the Executive Dysfunction of the modern subject. People are overwhelmed by choices. Hall says: In War, you have no choices, only orders. And that is freedom from anxiety.
• The Danger: He is defining the "Total State" (Totalitarianism) as the cure for the "Lazy State" (Democracy).

The Rejection of the Martyr.

• The Shift: This is crucial. Pageau might romanticize the "Sacred Event." Hall technocratizes it.
• The Critique: He calls Mangione's act "Stupid." Why?
  • Not because killing a CEO is wrong.
  • But because getting caught or failing to overthrow the system is wrong.
• The Redefinition of Morality: Hall explicitly says: "Stupid… is also immoral."
  • The Dharmic Twist: In Buddhism, Amoral action is rooted in delusion. Hall twists this. He claims that Ineffectiveness is the only Sin. If you kill and win, you are moral. If you kill and lose (like Mangione), you are immoral.
• The Message to the Audience: "Don't be like Luigi. Don't just go shoot a guy and get caught. That's 'lazy' war. If you want to fight, you need to fight a 'Systems War' (which implies something much bigger and more organized)."

The Zero-Sum Prison.

• The Worldview: Hall paints a picture of reality where Collaboration is impossible. There is only Domination or Submission.
• The Fear: "Subject to the value structures of some other will."
  • This is the core fear of the Far Right: Heteronomy (Being ruled by others). They cannot conceive of a world where different values coexist. They believe one Will must crush the others.
• The Incitement: He tells the audience: "If you are not fighting a Total War, you are already dead (subject to another's will)." This is an existential threat designed to mobilize the "lazy" listener into action.

The Nietzschean (or Hobbsian) nightmare at the heart of Jordan Hall’s worldview. His definition of "Death" is not biological cessation; it is Submission.

Focus on how Hall creates a Zero-Sum Spiritual Prison.

The Pathologizing of Peace

[00:10:35] "we've been raised in a really, really remarkably lazy and cowardly context… we face no duress… even our crises would be considered a good day for almost anybody who's ever lived."

The Ingratitude of the Warlord.

• The Reality: The "lazy context" he mocks is Civilization. It is the result of thousands of years of struggle to create a world where you don't have to face "duress" every day.
• The Negging: As you noted, he breaks the ego of the young man. He tells him: Your safety is your shame.
• The Trap: He equates Trauma with Authenticity. If you aren't suffering or fighting, you aren't "Real." This is a recruitment drive for misery.

The Fascist Alignment (The "Straightforward Telos")

[00:11:17] "when you are at war… everything starts to line up. Everything becomes very strictly organized and a very straightforward telos."

The Relief of Totalitarianism.

• The Diagnostic: Hall understands that modern freedom is exhausting ("The Paradox of Choice").
• The Cure: He offers War as a stress-relief mechanism. In War, you don't have to think; you just Obey.
• The "Telos": This is the seductive promise of Fascism. It aligns the State, the Soul, and the Gun into one straight line. It cures the "Muddiness" Pageau hates, but the price is the annihilation of the Self.

The Definition of Hell (Heteronomy)

[00:12:18] "you are now subject to the hierarchy and the value structures of some other will… some part of you is dead… Otherwise there would never been a war in the first place."

The Zero-Sum Prison.

• The Fear: This is the core neurosis of the Reactionary Right. They view Empathy or Compromise as "Death."
  • If I accept a trans person's pronouns, I am "subject to their value structure." -> I am Dead.
  • If I pay taxes to a liberal state, I am "subject to another will." -> I am Dead.
• The Radicalization: By defining "Living in a Society" (which always requires compromising wills) as "Death," he makes Total War the only way to be "Alive."
• The Dharmic Critique: This is the ultimate Delusion of Self. Hall believes the "Self" is only real if it dominates everything around it. Buddhism teaches the Self is an illusion; clinging to it this tightly is the cause of all suffering.

The Critique of the "Stupid" Terrorist (Luigi Mangione)

[00:13:18] "Charlie, the Italian kid who shot the executive… you're not fighting war right… stupid in the context of war is also immoral because it just means that you'll lose."

The Technocrat’s Absolution.

• The Morality Flip: Hall doesn't say "Thou Shalt Not Kill." He says "Thou Shalt Not Fail."
• The Instruction: He is effectively telling the audience:
  • Luigi failed because he used a pistol (Kinetic War).
  • You must win by using the Network (Systems War).
• The Danger: He is upgrading the terrorist. He is telling the "Random Schizophrenic" to put down the gun and pick up the Disinformation Amplifier, because that kills the enemy's "Value Structure" more effectively than a bullet kills a CEO.

The Peace that is not Laziness

"Jordan Hall calls you 'cowardly' because you live in peace. He calls you 'lazy' because you are not hunting your neighbor.

It takes no courage to destroy. A child can knock down a tower. An idiot can pull a trigger.

The true courage—the 'Maximum Skin in the Game'—is to live in a world of Other Wills without trying to crush them. To look at a neighbor who holds different values and say, 'I will not kill you. I will not subordinate you. I will live with you.'

That is not 'Death.' That is Civilization. And it is the only thing keeping the monsters at bay."

---

[Hamilton]: [00:13:21] I can't remember his Italian last name, but yes, you're, you're not fighting war, right?

[Hall]: [00:13:26] You may, you may use a logic of where at war and therefore this is justified, but the point is you're being very, very, and I'm being, I'm going to be, uh, non. I want to use the, the kind of, the kind of morality at the level of war, which is you're going to lose that war. That is a stupid way to fight war. It is a, as a way to fight war stupidly and stupid in context of war is also immoral because it just means that you'll lose. And therefore everything you value is, is, has been sacrificed on the basis of your own stupidity. So what does it mean to fight war wisely? And I, and I'll use wise even more, you know, wise includes within it something like effectively. So this is then when I started to import that notion of the fifth generation warfare frame, and then we'll blend over to spiritual war. Cause one of the things that happens is as we have moved forward in the art of war, we have more and more, um, spiritualized the way that we go about waging war by necessity. (…) So, you know, you, and in fact, I wrote an essay about this. It was called the war on sensemaking.
[00:14:26] Um, at the moment at the end of world war two, with the kind of mushroom clouds coming up in Japan, we had reached a point where kinetic war had, um, been both maximized and had in some sense come to an end. Meaning we'd reached the edge of what could be done by virtue of just blowing the other guy up. Um, because now we have mutually assured destruction. And if you try to blow the other guy up, he can blow you up and nobody can win that war. Okay. So with that required though, it's kind of like a pressure cooker, meaning we're still going to be waging war. And this is important to keep in mind. There's no other way around it. Um, well, how do we do that? So we had to become more subtle. So the cold war is this war of, of spies and propaganda. And what it does is it almost like, think about it as this is the way it's always been, but it forces it to become more refined. It squeezes the front, the location where conflict occurs into every possible location. (.) The Chinese have in fact have formalized this with what they call systems war, which is just to say what I just said.
[00:15:28] So, uh, the technique of systems war is you probe in what might even appear to be arbitrary locations. Let's try cyber war here. Let's try influencing filmmaking there. Let's try, um, embedding backdoors in television and group and, uh, laundry machine chips, whatever it is. Um, and just watch and see where you're able to get more advantage, right? So think of this as a very fluid, modular thing that doesn't have any particular preconceived notion of where and how war is waged, but rather is able to deploy continuously. But ultimately, yes, recognizing that there's a sense of who is on each side, but as you accelerate through the fifth generation warfare, even that begins to break down because of course, when you're engaging in maximum psyops, um, part of psyops is obfuscation of identity. And who exactly plausible deniability and even engaging in actions where the, the causation becomes diffuse. Have you heard of something? Uh, what is it called? (..)
[00:16:29] I heard about from Bruce Sterling a long time ago. I think it has a technical term now, but there should be something like, let's say I want somebody dead. Uh, and what I do is I produce a propaganda field that would have the statistical likelihood of provoking some random schizophrenic to decide that that's the guy he needs to take out to get his craziness to go away.

---

The Nihilistic Pragmatism.

• The Inversion: In every spiritual tradition (including Buddhism and Christianity), "Morality" is defined by Right Action and Compassion, regardless of the outcome. Hall inverts this. He claims Morality = Victory.
• The Danger: If "winning" is the only moral requirement, then any atrocity is justified as long as it works.
  • Luigi Mangione wasn't "immoral" because he killed a father; he was "immoral" because he didn't overthrow the healthcare system.
• The Instruction: He is telling the audience: "Do not be a martyr. Be a winner. Even if you have to be a monster to do it."

The Weaponization of Samsara.

• The Context: "Kinetic War" (Explosions) is blocked by Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD). So the energy of violence must go somewhere.
• The New Battlefield: It moves into the Noosphere (The sphere of human thought).
  • "Squeezes the front… into every possible location": This is a terrifying description of Totalitarian Paranoia. He is saying that your movies, your laundry machine chips, your television, and your social media are all active war zones.
• The "War on Sensemaking": This is Hall’s famous essay.
  • CosmoBuddhist Critique: In Buddhism, we practice Mindfulness to make sense of reality. Hall describes a strategy to destroy the mind's ability to make sense. He advocates for (or at least neutrally describes) the deliberate inducing of mass psychosis to destabilize the enemy.

The Algorithm of Mara.

• The Definition: This is the textbook definition of Stochastic Terrorism.
  • The Speaker: The "I" in this sentence ("Let's say I want somebody dead") is the hypothetical 5th Gen Warrior.
  • The Method:
    1. The Goal: Assassination ("Want somebody dead").
    2. The Tool: A "Propaganda Field" (The rhetoric of Pageau/Peterson/Hall).
    3. The Bullet: A "Random Schizophrenic" (The radicalized viewer).
    4. The Trigger: The mental illness of the target ("To get his craziness to go away").
• The Evil of "Diffuse Causation":
  • Hall calls this "Plausible Deniability."
  • The Moral Reality: This is Cowardice. The instigator wants the murder to happen but refuses to pull the trigger. They outsource the sin to the mentally ill, then claim they are innocent because there is no "linear connection."
• The Synthesis with Pageau:
  • Pageau builds the Propaganda Field (calling violence "Sacred").
  • Hall explains the Mechanic (using that field to trigger the schizophrenic).
  • PVK watches it happen, knowing exactly what is going on.

The Advertising and surveillance Industrial Complex of Terror

1. The Tool: The Algorithm as a Mercenary

• The "Propaganda Field" is not magic; it is Surveillance Capitalism. Ranking algorithms (which are rigid rule-sets, not AI) prioritize outrage.
• The Racket: As you noted, there is an alignment of incentives between Extremists, Private Intel, and Organized Crime.
  • The Mechanism: They pay to boost the signal.
  • The Payoff: When the violence happens, the Private Intelligence firms say, "Look at this chaos! We need more funding to monitor these dangerous groups."
  • Critique: This is the Arsonist-Firefighter Complex. They are paid to light the fire (via targeted disinformation) and then paid again to put it out (via surveillance contracts). It is "Banality in the purest sense"—evil committed not for theology, but for quarterly budget justification.

2. The Bullet: The Invisible Silo

• Your Insight: Democrats and normal people never see these videos. They are "Dark Posts" or micro-targeted content.
• The Reality Tunnel: This explains why the "Random Schizophrenic" feels so isolated. The algorithm surrounds them with a reality that no one else sees.
  • The Trap: The victim thinks, "Why isn't everyone freaking out about this?" This discrepancy drives them further into madness ("Lashing out in frustration," as you said).
  • The "Useful Idiot": The influencer (Pageau) is just the lure. The hook is the ad-tech that ensures the lure finds the fish.

3. The Trigger: Agile Scapegoating

• The Insight: Pageau switches targets constantly (AI, "Technology", Jews, Trans people) to maintain deniability.
• The "Agile" Method: This prevents a solid counter-narrative from forming. If you accuse him of anti-Semitism, he pivots to attacking "The AI." If you defend AI, he pivots to "Technology bad."
  • The Constant: The Target changes, but the Anger remains. The goal is not to defeat an enemy; the goal is to maintain the state of agitation in the viewer so they remain profitable to the surveillance platform.

The Economy of Mara

The Merchant in the Temple (Surveillance Capitalism)

"Jordan Hall speaks of a 'War on Sensemaking.' But let us look at who is funding this war.

You, the viewer, are made to think you are a soldier on a heros journey in a spiritual battle. You are not. You are a pawn. You are a data point being sold to the highest bidder

1. The Extraction: They extract your frustration, your loneliness, and your fear.
2. The Refinement: They refine it using the rhetoric of 'Sacred Violence' (Pageau) and 'Systems War' (Hall).
3. The Sale: They sell your radicalization to Private Intelligence firms who use your potential for violence (or “Sacred Events” which is a malicious interpretation of the sacred.) to justify their existence.

They claim to be fighting terrorists. But in the shadows of the algorithm, they are farming them. They are watering the seeds of your suffering with disinformation, waiting for the harvest of violence so they can cash the check.
This is not the 'Sacred Refounding' of the world. This is a Protection Racket. They break your mind so they can sell you the crutch."

Jordan Hall tells us that because they cannot drop nuclear bombs without dying, they have decided to drop Information Bombs into your mind.

He explicitly tells you that the goal of this 'Systems War' is to make 'Causation Diffuse.' Why? So that when the 'Random Schizophrenic'—perhaps a young man broken by loneliness and algorithm addiction—finally snaps and kills, the Generals of this war can stand back and say, 'We didn't do it. We were just talking about philosophy.'

They treat the suffering of the mentally ill not as a tragedy to be healed, but as a kinetic resource to be harvested. They use your confusion ('The War on Sensemaking') as a weapon.

This is not 'Spiritual War.' This is the industrialization of insanity."

---

[Hamilton]: [00:16:51] Yeah.

[Hall]: [00:16:51] There's no connection, no causal linear connection between me and the actual event. And yet there is a connection between me and the actual event.

[Hamilton]: [00:16:58] Yeah.

[Hall]: [00:16:59] That's, uh, but what begin to see is you begin to see causation becomes diffuse identity becomes diffuse. This is why I said the heart, the centerpiece, as you move through the arc of fifth generation warfare, it actually becomes isomorphic with what we would have called spiritual warfare in a very beautiful way. A very powerful and confusing way. (..) Um, who are you? What, what are your values? Like if, if the end of the day, if, if, if to defeat you in war is to basically say, I now subordinate your values to my, my values. If I can get you to become confused about what your values are and to lose track of what you value or even what it means to value anything, then that's a perfectly great way to do it. And maybe actually much more effective than trying to blow you up. Cause if I, you know, charge at you with a machine gun, I mean, harden your values, I mean, harden your commitment. And if I fail to really thoroughly kill you in some time, you'll come back and you may be subtle about it. I think Rome and Greece, Rome ostensibly conquered Greece, but in, in, in, in many ways, Greece conquered Rome through the, through the end of the door. (…)
[00:18:01] So, and this is, I think the point of here is I think this is where we are. So we're in this really interesting circumstance that we're in diagnostically, we're at war. And perhaps it's proper to say that we have always been at war. This is back to the Paul reference and we'll connect back up to spiritual war. But the, the, the materiality of that war has become more and more palpable. And so, okay. So now it's shifted Roman numeral two spiritual war.

---

The Technocrat’s Delight.

• The "Grain of Truth": Hall accurately describes the non-linear nature of Hybrid Warfare.
• The Grift: He calls it "Beautiful."
  • The Moral Rot: He just described a system where you trick a mentally ill person into committing murder ("provoking a random schizophrenic"). To look at that mechanism and call it "Beautiful" is the mark of a sociopath (or a technocrat who has abstracted human suffering into data).
  • The "Isomorphism": He claims this military tactic is the same shape (isomorphic) as Spiritual Warfare.
    • Dharma Check: Spiritual Warfare (in the Christian or Buddhist sense) is a battle against internal demons (sin, delusion). Hall redefines it as a battle to inflict delusion on others. He is calling the work of the Devil ("The Father of Lies") "Beautiful" because it is effective.

The "War on Sensemaking" Revealed.

• The Goal: "Subordinate your values to my values."
  • This is Totalitarianism. It is not enough to control your body; they must colonize your mind.
• The Tactic:Induced Confusion.
  • Surveillance Capitalism Connection: As you noted, this is exactly what the algorithm does. It floods the user with conflicting, outrage-inducing noise until they "lose track of what they value."
  • The Weapon: Hall frames this confusion not as a side effect of social media, but as a Strategic Victory. When you feel lost, anxious, and unsure of reality, Hall says: "Good. We are winning."
  • The Ethno-Nationalist Angle: This is why they attack "Post-Modernism" while using Post-Modern tactics. They want to deconstruct your values (Liberalism, Democracy, Compassion) so they can replace them with their values (Hierarchy, Authority, Violence).

The Reactionary Trope.

• The Grain of Truth: Culturally, Greek philosophy and art did influence Rome heavily.
• The Bullshit Fantasy (The Grift): In Far-Right circles, this analogy is code for "The Enemy Within."
  • They use this to argue that while "Conservatives" (Rome) won the Cold War or the elections, the "Leftists/Marxists" (Greece) have conquered the culture from the inside (The Long March through the Institutions).
  • The Projection: Hall is using this to justify his own subversive tactics. He is saying: "They did it to us (allegedly), so we must do it to them. We must be the virus inside the system."

The Justification for Atrocity.

• The Logic: If we are always at war, then the rules of peace (laws, civility, honesty) never apply.
• The Trap: This creates a Permanent State of Exception.
  • Why did we lie to you? We are at war.
  • Why did we trigger a schizophrenic to shoot a CEO? We are at war.
  • Why are we dismantling democracy? We are at war.
• The Spiritual Bypass: By connecting this back to "Paul" (The Apostle) and "Spiritual War," he gives this cynical, materialist "Forever War" a holy gloss. He makes Paranoia a religious duty.

Hall takes the Material Reality of 5th Gen Warfare (Propaganda/destabilization) and the Economic Reality of Surveillance Capitalism (Induced Confusion), and wraps them in the Language of Theology ("Spiritual War," "Beautiful").
He admits that his strategy is to make you "confused about what your values are."

This is the final locking mechanism of the trap. The "Isomorphic" reference. It is a direct signal to the Jordan Peterson crowd (Maps of Meaning), telling them: "The map of Military Strategy and the map of Spiritual Reality are now the same map."

By collapsing these two domains, Hall achieves the ultimate Moral Laundering. If Military PsyOps are "isomorphic" with Spiritual Warfare, then lying is no longer a sin; it is a "Spiritual Tactic."

Here is the refined exegesis, integrating your insight on the Petersonian Map and the Grifter's Logic.

The Isomorphism of Mara (The Moral Laundry)

[00:17:08] "it actually becomes isomorphic with what we would have called spiritual warfare in a very beautiful way."

1. The Map is the Trap (Peterson Connection)

• The Reference: As you noted, "Isomorphism" implies that the structure of "A" (5th Gen War) matches the structure of "B" (Spiritual Reality).
• The Grift: This is a category error weaponized for influence.
  • Spiritual War is about Truth (dispelling illusion).
  • 5th Gen War is about Deception (creating illusion).
  • By calling them "Isomorphic," Hall claims they are the same. He is telling the audience that Deception is Truth. This is the definition of Diabolical (The Divider/Liar).

2. The "Beautiful" Horror

• The Quote: "In a very beautiful way."
• The Diagnostic: This is the "Technocrat's Delight." He is looking at a machine designed to drive people insane (the stochastic trigger) and admiring its efficiency.
  • It is the same aesthetic appreciation a virus writer feels for a piece of malware that successfully bricks a million computers. He is not looking at the suffering users; he is looking at the code.

The Colonization of Value (Totalitarianism)

[00:17:26] "I now subordinate your values to my, my values. If I can get you to become confused about what your values are… then that's a perfectly great way to do it."

The War on the Soul.

• The Goal: "Subordination." This is not conversion; it is domination.
• The Tactic:Induced Confusion.
  • The Algorithm: This is the "War on Sensemaking" in practice. They don't need you to believe their lies; they just need you to doubt your truths.
  • The Result: A confused person is a suggestible person. Once you "lose track of what you value," you are an empty vessel waiting for the "Strong Man" (Pageau/Peterson/Hall) to fill you with their values.

The "Greece vs. Rome" (The Subversion Fantasy)

[00:17:50] "Greece conquered Rome through the, through the end of the door."

The Justification for the Long March.

• The Trope: The Right believes the "Left" (Greece) conquered the "West" (Rome) via culture (The Long March through the Institutions).
• The Projection: Hall uses this to justify his own subversion.
  • The Logic: "They cheated to win, so we must cheat to win back."
  • The Reality: He is advocating for a "Backdoor Trojan Horse" strategy against his own society. He views his fellow citizens not as countrymen, but as Romans to be subverted by his "Greek" (Esoteric/Reactionary) virus.

The State of Exception (The Forever War)

[00:18:01] "diagnostically, we're at war. And perhaps it's proper to say that we have always been at war."

The Universal Excuse.

• The Trap: If we are always at war, then:
  • There is no Civil Rights.
  • There is no Truth.
  • There is no Peace.
• The Result: This creates a Permanent State of Emergency. Fascism thrives in emergencies. If the war never ends, the General never has to step down. Hall is declaring martial law on the mind, forever.

"The Peace of the Brave"

"They tell you that you are in a permanent war. They tell you that confusion is a weapon, and that lying is 'isomorphic' with the Spirit.

They want you to believe that the only way to be safe is to let them colonize your mind, to let them 'subordinate your values' to their machine.

We refuse.

We know that True Spiritual Warfare is not about confusing your neighbor; it is about Clarifying your own Heart. It is about seeing through the 'Propaganda Field' to the human being underneath.

They want you to be a 'Random Schizophrenic' trigger. We invite you to be a Mindful Bodhisattva—awake, aware, and immune to their 'Beautiful' lies."

---

[PVK] : [00:18:27] And, and, and we're so used to thinking in our materialist frame that we, you know, we, we think in terms of these kinetic wars when we don't understand that these wars fundamentally change us religiously, spiritually, they, they transform us. (…)

---

This short segment acts as the airlock. We are moving from the "Dirty Room" (Hall’s admission of triggering “schizophrenics” with propaganda) to the "Clean Room" (Theology and Angels).
PVK’s interjection here is vital: The mechanism of this war is not just political; it is Ontological. It changes what we are.
Here is the exegesis of The Semantic Airlock.

The Admission of Mutation

[PVK] "And, and, and we're so used to thinking in our materialist frame that we, you know, we, we think in terms of these kinetic wars when we don't understand that these wars fundamentally change us religiously, spiritually, they, they transform us."

• The Truth: PVK is right. You cannot swim in a river of poison without absorbing it.
• The Warning: He is telling the audience that the "5th Generation War" (The War on Sensemaking) is not something you watch; it is something you become.
  • The Mutation: If you spend your days consuming "Stochastic Propaganda" designed to trigger rage, you are being "transformed." You are not becoming a "Soldier of God"; you are becoming a Node of Trauma.
  • The Spiritual Cost: In Buddhism, this is the accumulation of Akusala Kamma (Unwholesome Action) of the mind. The "Transformation" PVK speaks of is actually a De-evolution—a descent into the realm of the Asuras (Angry demi-gods/Titans).

The "Angel" as a PsyOp (Semantic Laundering)

[Hall] "So now let's shift to Roman numeral two spiritual war… Pajot and Vervencki… helping to make clear the meaning of some of these terms… What is spirit? What is spiritual being? And what is an angel?"
The Redefinition of Reality.

• The Strategy: Jordan Hall just finished explaining how to use "Propaganda Fields" to kill people. Now, he immediately pivots to "What is an Angel?"
  • Why? Because he needs to Sacralize the Software.
• The "Pageau/Vervaeke" Cipher:
  • In this intellectual corner (The "Liminal Web"), they redefine "Angels" and "Demons" not as cartoon winged creatures, but as "Patterns of Agency" or "Egregors" (Collective thoughts that take on a life of their own).
  • The Grift: This sounds sophisticated. But watch what happens when you plug it into Hall's previous admission:
    • If an "Angel" is a "Pattern of Agency" that directs human behavior…
    • And an Algorithm is a "Pattern of Agency" that directs human behavior…
    • Then Hall is about to argue that The Algorithm is an Angel.
• The Trap: By redefining these terms, he allows the Technocrat (himself) to pretend to be a Theologian. He isn't talking about Divine Messengers; he is talking about Memetic Payloads. But by calling them "Angels," he disarms the religious viewer and recruits them into his "Systems War."

Summary of the Move: They are scrubbing the blood off the floor.

1. Minute 16: We trigger schizophrenics to kill. (Ugly Reality)
2. Minute 18: Let’s talk about Angels and Spirit! (Beautiful Fantasy)

They are preparing to argue that the "Propaganda Field" that triggers the violence is actually a form of "Angelic Intervention" or "Spiritual Reality."

---

[Hall]: [00:18:52] So now let's shift to Roman numeral two spiritual war. (..) And I noticed that, for example, Pageau and Vervencki have been having some, Pageau, but in particular Pageau have been having some really interesting ways of helping to make clear the meaning of some of these terms. (.) What is, what is, what is spirit? What is spiritual being? And what is an angel? Because.

[Hamilton]: [00:19:13] That conversation they just had recently was, was really, really good on that.

[Hall]: [00:19:16] Really good. Because what we have is an image of a spiritualized or supernaturalized or fantasized version of the ordinary reality that we tend to see. Yeah. So say, okay, an angel is like a mailman, but with wings and invisible. Oh, okay. That's, that's not what we mean, but the problem is we don't have it. Like, that's how we played it out. And we say, okay, demon demon is like a bully, like a physical bat or like a really bad bear who is smart, smarter than a bear, but basically looks like that. But, you know, dark and mostly invisible comes out of the shadows, something like that is special effects. It's a very special effects, heavy image. But the point, I believe, that they were making and Peugeot has been making is that there's actually just one world. Yeah. And in that, in that world, these concepts are real and in many places, very commonplace. As he talks about like the gargoyle and the notion of the, the edge. I think his thing on Superman was very nice. Like this idea of, hey, what does it mean for somebody to be from the outside and to bring special capabilities to the inside?
[00:20:22] And is he a spy, is he an agent, or is he in fact a hero, somebody who is serving the inside, but bringing special knowledge to the outside? That's a very clean way of describing a particular archetype that is spiritual, right? So now we're beginning to kind of hammer on the notion of reconnecting to Paul. All right. So now let's reconnect to Paul and also kind of ring the bells on this notion of fifth generation warfare vis-a-vis Gen Z. (..) So when we move to sort of between number Roman numeral two and Roman numeral three, so I'm going to bring discipleship into it as well. (.) The commitment, the requirement, and the actual diagnosis is that we are fully immersed and have always been and shall always be fully immersed in a spiritual war, which is to say, very simply, everything matters. (.) Every choice you make, every action you take, every breath, every word is ultimately laden with consequence.
[00:21:25] It's either towards God or away from God. There is no neutral and there is no irrelevant. (.) Well, that's a wartime footing, right? And that's that mentality of full skin of the game, full stake, and by the way, profoundly pitted adversary who is committed to kicking you in the wrong direction and is waging fifth generation warfare, which is to say, waging warfare through any means available. (..) Okay. (..) And so we say, oh, wow, the actual ordinary proper footing of a Christian in discipleship is war. And I should say, just to harken back, and not stupid war. (..) Let us not endeavor to wage the war against powers and principalities stupidly. And a very simple example of that would be to try to wage that war on our own behalf or even just using our own purposes, our own power, our own capabilities, because we'll lose that war. Because the adversary we're facing is infinitely more capable than we are at every one of those characteristics.
[00:22:25] And we'll be given one very specific needle to the thread, which is to be on the cross. And then there's a way, there's a very specific way to participate in the war that is being waged. Now it can actually shift it. The war that is ongoing, it may in fact just be the nature of the world into which we are thrown. (.) And so it gets very narrow. It gets very tight.

---

Jordan Hall is doing something very subtle and very dangerous here. He is taking the concept of "Spiritual War" and removing the "Spirit" from it, collapsing it entirely into the material/informational world ("There's actually just one world").
Why does he do this? Because if "Spiritual War" is just "Information War" (5th Gen Warfare), then Propaganda becomes a Sacrament.
Here is the exegesis of The Sacralization of Paranoia.

The Materialist "Angel" (Sacralizing the Algorithm)

[00:19:16] "…what we have is an image of a spiritualized or supernaturalized or fantasized version of the ordinary reality… say, okay, an angel is like a mailman, but with wings… that's not what we mean… there's actually just one world. Yeah. And in that, in that world, these concepts are real and in many places, very commonplace."

The Collapse of the Divine.

• The "One World" Trap: Hall argues against the "cartoon" version of angels (wings/clouds). This sounds smart. He pivots to the Pageau/Vervaeke definition: Angels are "Patterns of Agency" or "Principalities" that govern reality.
• The Grift: By saying there is "Only One World" (this one), he collapses the Transcendent into the Immanent.
  • The Consequence: If there is only one world, and "Angels" are real forces within it that distribute information and agency… then The Algorithm is an Angel.
  • The Theological Hack: This allows Hall to treat Surveillance Capitalism not as a corporate product, but as a Celestial Hierarchy. The "Pattern" that radicalizes you isn't a Javascript function; it's a "Principality." This makes resisting the algorithm feel like resisting God (or fighting a Demon, depending on which side you are on).

The Superman/Spy Archetype (The Foreign Agent)

[00:20:22] "…what does it mean for somebody to be from the outside and to bring special capabilities to the inside? And is he a spy, is he an agent, or is he in fact a hero… bringing special knowledge to the outside?"

The Hero with a Thousand Backdoors.

• The Archetype: He explicitly links the Hero (Superman) with the Spy/Agent.
• The Function: This justifies the Infiltrator.
  • In the context of "5th Gen Warfare" (which relies on destabilization), the "Spy" injects chaos (disinformation) into the "Inside" (the society).
  • Hall rebrands this Agent Provocateur as a "Hero" bringing "Special Knowledge" (Gnosis).
• The Dog Whistle: This validates the role of the Influencer-Agent. Figures like Pageau (or Hall himself) view themselves as "Spies for the Sacred," injecting "Divine Viruses" into the secular system to crash it.

The Abolition of Neutrality (Totalitarianism)

[00:21:25] "Every choice you make… is ultimately laden with consequence. It's either towards God or away from God. There is no neutral and there is no irrelevant. (.) Well, that's a wartime footing, right?"

— The Death of the Private Sphere.

• The Panopticon of Conscience: "There is no neutral." This is the defining characteristic of Totalitarianism (and high-control cults).
  • Democracy requires a private sphere where things don't matter politically. You can just mow your lawn or watch a movie.
  • Fascism demands Total Mobilization. If you are resting, you are aiding the enemy.
• The Surveillance Link: Hall aligns God's judgment with the Data Economy. In Surveillance Capitalism, "There is no irrelevant." Every click is data. Every pause is a signal.
  • He elevates this Data Extraction to a Spiritual Duty. He tells the user: "You must be hyper-vigilant because the Universe (and the Algorithm) is watching everything you do." This induces the state of anxiety required for radicalization.

The "Infinitely Capable Adversary" (Learned Helplessness)**

[00:22:25] "Let us not endeavor to wage the war… on our own behalf… because we'll lose that war. Because the adversary we're facing is infinitely more capable than we are at every one of those characteristics."

The Feudal Submission.

• The Adversary: Who is this "Infinitely Capable Adversary"?
  • Theologically: Satan.
  • Materially (in 5th Gen War): The "System," The "Globalists," or "The AI."
• The Trap: Hall tells the individual: "You are powerless. You cannot fight this on your own."
  • The Solution: He doesn't say "Find peace within." He says "Don't fight on your own behalf."
  • The Implication: You must become a soldier for our side. You must submit to our "Pattern of Agency" (Our Egregor/Angel) to fight their "Pattern of Agency" (The Demon).
  • This is Feudalism. The Peasant cannot fight the Dragon; he must pledge fealty to the Warlord (Pageau/Hall's ideology) for protection.

The Weaponized Cross (The Needle)

[00:22:25] "And we'll be given one very specific needle to the thread, which is to be on the cross. And then there's a way, there's a very specific way to participate in the war…"

The Fetishization of Martyrdom.

• The "Needle": He narrows the options down to one: "To be on the cross."
• The Distortion: In the Gospels, the Cross is the end of the war logic (Jesus refuses to fight back). Hall turns the Cross into a weapon of war ("A way to participate in the war").
• The Stochastic Trigger: He is telling the "Random Schizophrenic": "The only way you can win against this infinite enemy is to Sacrifice yourself."
  • This is the logic of the Suicide Bomber. The martyr believes that by destroying themselves (being on the cross), they are striking a spiritual blow against the Enemy. Hall sanitizes this death-wish as "Discipleship."

Jordan Hall has just defined "Christian Discipleship" as:

1. Total Surveillance ("No neutral").
2. Total Mobilization ("Wartime footing").
3. Total Submission to a "Higher Pattern" (because you are weak).
4. Self-Destruction as a strategic imperative ("Be on the cross").

It is a Funnel for Radicalization.

---

[PVK] : [00:22:49] Now, a lot of what we've seen in Ukraine is talk about how drones, I looked at one person was talking about, there's been three phases of the Ukraine war. There was the first phase in which it seemed to be the kind of war we expected. The Russians completely botched kind of the combined infantry segment they wanted. They thought they could maybe just grasp Ukraine right away. And then that broke down. And then suddenly we're into a redux of the Cold War where it was artillery and tanks. And Russia is pulling out all of its back catalog for this stuff. And now we're into this third wave, which is a new kind of war where, you know, it's drones and the front lines are different and everybody's looking up in the sky because a little drone's going to come down and get them. You know, at the beginning of the first World War II, you had all of these massive, you had these massive armies now connected with rails.
[00:23:56] You had this question of mobilization. You had all of these cavalry units yet at the beginning of the first World War. And so, but war is changing us at such a fundamental level. And it's changing these bodies that we are, that we participate in, that we are part of, that we are, that we are doing. And again, the first World War begins with, at the end of the first World War, you've got Tsarist Russia is gone. The Austro-Hungarian Empire is gone. The Ottoman Empire is gone. (..) These, these empires, these old style empires are sorely, they figure, well, we're going to, we're going to move them out. So, and of course, Wilson comes there as sort of the anti-imperialist, even though America has, you know, won in the Spanish-American War. It's got the Philippines and Cuba.
[00:24:57] So it's, America is sort of this really reluctant empire, whereas Britain and France are looking to cement, you know, expand their empires now as victors in the war. And Japan is looking to get into the imperial game, which is, of course, really going to set up the Second World War. And Germany is the loser, it's going to lose its, its smaller holdings. Italy is going to be incentivized to think about North Africa and regaining the glory of the Roman Empire. And of course, you know, you're going to have the rise of fascism with Franco and then Mussolini. And then, of course, Hitler, who's, who's, who's a fascist, he looks at Mussolini as sort of his model, but very quickly sort of outstrips him and becomes the senior partner in that relationship. So the League of Nations is, is sort of the proto-United Nations.

[00:25:58] And when you read about what they were, what at least Wilson was thinking, what some were thinking, it was the idea of basically one world government. That one world government at the League of Nations is going to, maybe all of the nations need to be disarmed and they'll just be one League of Nations army. Well, maybe the nations will be allowed to have their own little, their own little armies, but only to keep domestic order so that they can't fight against each other. And, you know, when they're negotiating about Germany, part of the question is how many troops should the Germans continue to have? But, of course, as you have the period between the First and the Second World War, it's not just a matter of what the treaty says the Germans will have. It's whether or not anybody has the, the guts to stand up and stop Germany when it decides to rearm, when it decides to basically throw out all of what was put together in Paris 1919 and retake land and rearm.
[00:27:02] And, but then, of course, Wilson comes with this idea of self-determination and that just sort of breaks everything open. And part of what the League of Nations is supposed to have are mandates. Even before the League Commission got to work, the issue of mandates had come up at the Supreme Council. None of the victorious powers thought Germany should get back its colonial possessions, which included several strings of Pacific islands and pieces of Africa. Japan would get some of those islands and, you know, that then would be a piece of what happens in the Second World War when you have America island hopping, doing that, and pieces of Africa. And Wilson made it clear that he expected the League to assume responsibility for their governance. Wilson's attitude came as an unwelcome shock in certain quarters. The French wanted Togoland and Cameroon and an end to German rights of Morocco, leaving France the latter's sole possessor. The Italians had their eyes on, among other things, parts of Somalia. In the British Empire, South Africa wanted German Southwest Africa.
[00:28:03] Australia wanted New Guinea and some nearby islands. New Zealand wanted German Samoa. The British hoped to annex German East Africa to fill in the missing link between their colonies North and South. They had also made a secret deal with the French to divvy up the Ottoman Empire. The Japanese, too, had their secret deals with the Chinese to take over German rights and concessions and with the British to keep the German islands north of the equator. Wilson's New World Order called for some arrangement other than annexation or colonization of those parts of the world, not yet ready to govern themselves. Okay, what did that mean? Not yet ready to govern themselves. You sort of have this tribal period where you have familial and kin relationships that sort of governs the relationship. You have these ancient empires that managed to govern massive numbers of kins. You read it all the time in the Bible, the king of kings. (.) And kings are sort of like a kinship thing. And the idea of not ready to govern themselves, this is the idea of they're going to need to adopt the machinery of the modern nation state,

[00:29:12] even though there's a lot going on with that. Because, of course, the war gets started because Serbia is really upset that the Austrian-Hungarian Empire, that was Catholic, annexed Bosnia-Herzegovina, that was, if I recall correctly, also Catholic. And Serbia looked at that and said, no, that should be part of greater Serbia because they looked at an old kingdom, etc., etc. It's an interesting part in that book on sleepwalkers, where it goes into the universal history of Serbia. (.) The first commandment of Serbian policy, he agreed, must be the principle of national unity, by which he meant the unification of all Serbs within the boundaries of a Serbian state. Where the Serbs dwell, that is Serbia. The historical template of this expansive vision of Serbian statehood was the medieval empire of Stefan Dusan,
[00:30:15] a vast swath of territory encompassing most of the present-day Serbian republic, along with the entirety of the present-day Albania, most of Macedonia, and all of central and northern Greece, but not Bosnia, interestingly enough. Tsar Dusan's empire had supposedly collapsed after the defeat at the hands of the Turks in Kosovo Field in 28 June 1389, but this setback, Garis Sananen, I can't pronounce these names, argued that it had not undermined a Serbian state's legitimacy, it had merely interrupted its historical existence. The restoration of a greater Serbia, unifying all Serbs, thus was thus no innovation, but the expression of an ancient historical right, I believe in another one of the books I read, Churchill talked about the fact that the Balkans, the Balkans created more history than they could digest, which was a really clever way of noting that

[00:31:17] it was just simply a warren of competing claims, and almost everybody could look back in their universal history to justify whatever massive borders they were looking for. And of course, that was at the heart of the 1919 conference. And so then you had all of these, not only did you have that in Europe, where you've got all of these competing claims, but then you get out into the rest of the world and you've got islands, which seem to be fairly coherent, but then they're not ready for, not ready for what? And basically the idea is they hadn't passed through all of the positions that Europe had sort of been bloodily passing through and trying to come to agreement on, okay, what is a nation? This is very Peugeot-ian in terms of how this all gets arranged. (.)
[00:32:22] In all the discussions, there'd been much talk about how glad the colonies were to get away from German rule. Yet, although the fifth of Wilson's 14 points had talked about taking the interests of the indigenous populations into account, no one had actually bothered to consult the Afro-Americans or the Pacific Islanders. True, no Samoans or Melanesians had come all this way to Paris, but they were Africans at hand. Indeed, a black French deputy from Senegal and the great American black leader W.E.B. Du Bois were busy organizing a pan-African Congress. This duly took place in February with the grudging consent of the peacemakers. None of the leading figures of the peace conference attended. A member of the Belgian delegation spoke enthusiastically about the reforms that were taking place in Congo. And a former minister of the foreign affairs of Portugal praised his own country's management of its colonies. A handful of delegates from French Africa demonstrated the success of the civilization mission by eulogizing the achievements of the Third Republic.

[00:33:25] The Congress passed resolutions calling for the peace conference to give the League direct control of former German colonies. House received Dubois with his customary courtesy, but said nothing about the resolutions. On and on and on it goes. And one word leads to another. And it is as is so often the case when things can no longer hold, war erupts and everything changes. (…..) One of the things that wars do is they provoke (.) religious conversions or deconversions at massive levels. And we saw this in the 20th century. You saw tremendous changes with respect to people's declarations about believe in God
[00:34:28] or not believe in God. (..) Wars bring people into moments of transformation where suddenly, whether it's at the end of the Holocaust, whole groups of people say, there is no God. Other groups of people say, there must be a God because only somehow a divine plan can help me move meaningfully through the world. (….) As we continue to watch the wars that are ongoing, hopefully we have no more. (..) Who knows? They always come up. But war plays an integral part in, I was in talking to a person today, I was noting how I'm in the book of Jeremiah. Jeremiah and what happens with the destruction of the kingdom of Judah and the exile. (.)
[00:35:32] If you look at biblical scholarship, this is such a fundamental turning point. I'm working on that in terms of my sermon. It's a fundamental turning point in terms of this whole story of Israel and the capacity of Israel. And, you know, synagogue worship begins. (..) The people become not just another group of people that sacrifice animals on altars, but they become people of the book. (.) And written language then takes on a whole different role in terms of who they are and what they believe. (..) Well, I'm out of time. This was terribly unorganized. (..) Just lodge your complaints below in the comment section if any of this made any sense or is any interest to you. (.)

The Rod: