Arsip Khutbah

An tseachtain seo beimid ag déanamh tráchtaireachta ar an bhfíseán: An grá a ordaíonn Íosa – Seanmóir Dé Domhnaigh an Easpaig Barron Is é an cur síos bunaidh ar an bhfíseán sin: Cairde, ar an gcúigiú Domhnach seo den Cháisc, tá soiscéal neamhghnách againn atá i gcroílár an rud Críostaí. Deir Íosa, ag tús monologue…

Leagann an leagan seo den mhaitrís béim ar dinimic iompraíochta seachas archetypes, ag eagrú patrúin trasna speictream ó neamh -aibíochta intuigthe go Ionramháil sainráite . Bain úsáid as seo chun a fháil amach an dtagann iompar duine aonair chun cinn ó chognaíocht tearcfhorbartha nó ó mheabhlaireacht d’aon ghnó. 🔢 Córas scórála: 🧠 Critéir iompraíochta Iompraíocht…

Critique ar AM I A Pseudo-intleachtúil? Le hábhar bónais: tacsanomaíocht pseudo-intollectualism Cad is bréige intleachtúil ann, agus cad a dhéanann intleachtúil mura ndéanann oideachas nó cáilíochtaí? Sa fhíseán seo, tógfaidh mé ar dhá fhíseán eile a phléann an topaic agus a chuireann an cheist: An bhfuil aon bhuntáiste ann go n-aithneofaí bréige-intleachta, nó an rud…

Stupidity and Psychoanalysis| Book Launch Seminar This Lacan in Scotland seminar “Stupidity and Psychoanalysis” took place 30 January 2025 on Zoom. The seminar celebrates the book launch of “Stupidity and Psychoanalysis: Lacanian Perspectives on New Subjectivities and Social Forms” with a panel discussion. The editor of the book, Professor Cindy Zeiher (University of Canterbury) serves…

This is a critique of the conversation from the video: There exists a peculiar paradox at the heart of modern neuroscience and philosophy—one that insists that despite our ability to reflect, deliberate, and act with intent, free will is nothing more than an illusion. Figures like [SH], wrapped in the certainty of their pop-neuroscientific reductionism,…

A good presentation on the topic of Pseudoscience and bullshit, titled: Why Bother? The Nature of Pseudoscience, How to Fight It, and Why It Matters | Massimo Pigliucci Why bother? I just checked on the Skeptical Inquirer website. I’ve written166 articles for Skeptical Inquirer. The first one came out in 1999 and it was askeptical…

Dr. Jordan B. Peterson sits down with Alex O’Connor and Richard Dawkins to discuss their differences of view on the Abrahamic biblical texts, truth claims in science and fiction, the extension of memes through Jungian archetypes, and the memetical reality of dragons. This episode was filmed on September 30th, 2024 Richard Dawkins is a British…

This is a critique of the video: Intro 0:00 imagine a society where the wealthiest0:01 few don’t just influence laws they write0:04 them where they don’t just benefit from0:07 policies they create them where state0:09 power isn’t just swayed by wealth it’s0:12 wielded by it sounds familiar well over This is a crucial introduction, setting…

Jonathan Pageau = [JP]Bishop Barron = [BB] 0:08 [BB] I’m delighted to be here with Jonathan Pau today Jonathan is a montreal-based artist he’s an icon Carver in the0:15 Orthodox tradition he’s also emerged I’d say in the last oh maybe 10 years as one of the most interesting and provocative0:22 commentators on Christianity and…

This is a review of: Why Critical Thinking is Dead – Peter Boghossian The description from the original video is: Peter Boghossian is an American philosopher. For ten years he was a professor of philosophy at Portland State University, but resigned following the college’s response to ‘the grievance studies affair’. This entailed Boghossian – alongside…