Sermon on 20240128

This sermon is a response to the following conversation:

Helen De Cruz - Morality, Prescriptive Behavior, Evil, and Suffering

The participants were:
[Helen De Cruz] whose speech is labeled as [HDC] in the transcript and

[Robert Lawrence Kuhn] whose speech is labeled as [RLK] in the transcript.

0:00 [RLK] Helen the importance of meditation uh

0:04 and being connected to uh an

0:09 independent, other reality is a very

0:12 important part of of Eastern Traditions

0:15 um and perhaps more so universally than

0:19 than Western religious Traditions

0:23 what, why, How is that and why is

0:26 that [HDC] I think that actually in all

0:29 religious Traditions there is an

0:31 intimate relationship between the

0:34 philosophical Concepts and the embodied

0:36 practices and I think that in eastern

0:39 religious

0:40 traditions this has been more explicit

0:43 or foregrounded and it seems to me like

0:46 in Christianity if we briefly compare

0:48 one of the reasons it isn't so

0:49 foregrounded is that you know you'd have

0:51 to go to convents and monasteries to

0:54 really get the contemplative life but uh

0:57 in eastern religious traditions like say

1:00 Zen Buddhism it's something you try to

1:02 incorporate in your everyday life and in

1:05 fact if you look at the history of say

1:07 Chinese philosophy then one of the

1:09 interesting things that you see is this

1:11 kind of back pulling back and forth so

1:13 one of the reasons that the early

1:14 confusions like shunza was an early

She is confusing the name of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shunza with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shunzhi_Emperor

1:17 confusion uh you know wrote so much

1:19 about ritual so early confusion said

1:22 ritual is very important ritual helps us

1:24 to cultivate ourselves helps us to

1:26 become better persons and one reason

1:29 they said that was that they felt the

1:31 heat of this foreign Indian philosophy

1:35 namely Buddhism and Buddhism had its own

1:38 meditative it had its own meditative

1:40 practices which had to do with you know

1:43 and that basically ultimately comes from

1:45 Hinduism

While it's true that Buddhism emerged in a context influenced by Hindu practices, it's crucial to understand the unique and distinct path Buddhism carved for itself. The assertion that Buddhism's meditative practices are merely derivatives of Hinduism is not only wrong, it’s also very insulting. There is a clear lack of understanding of the differences between Hinduism and Buddhism, and it’s also low-level https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_genocide where the attacks are against the culture by erasure of the individuals who developed the beliefs, and co-opting of their cultural beliefs, while distorting them to purposefully mislead, and/or to conform with via subjugation one religion to another. This is most obvious in that Hinduism is poly-theist, Buddhism is monotheist. Hinduism is a caste system, Buddhism is about EQUALITY. Buddhism arose directly as a result of the problems of Hinduism. This difference is why the Hindu swastika 卐 turns clockwise and the Buddhist sauvastika turns counter clockwise .
Her claim here, is the equivalent of saying that the Nazis beliefs were based on Buddhism.
As if their claims that the supreme being is Brahman, was a Buddhist belief.
Which obviously means that the Buddha is the Übermensch that Nietzsche was talking about right?
And the jews were considered the equivalents of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dalit which is a Buddhist belief right? Wong.

The Rigveda and claimed to have found a connection between the swastika and an enigmatic ancient people, the Aryans.
Supposedly, this 'master race' of warriors constituted the peak of human civilisation, conquering lands such as India and bringing the swastika with them. The word Aryan itself derived from Sanskrit, like svastika.

In case you are very mentally slow, notice the similarities between the descriptions of the Brahman caste and the concepts around 'master race' and "In red we see the social idea of the movement, in white the nationalistic idea, in the swastika the mission of the struggle for the victory of the Aryan man," wrote Hitler in his 1925 autobiographical manifesto, Mein Kampf.

It's more or less supposed to be something more like a wheel as drawn by someone who sucks at art, representing The wheel of Rebirth, or the cyclic nature of life and death. See more here

Interesting to note that somehow that page doesn’t display on wikipedia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_Brahminism
However, actual genocide, more than once, is also the reason that, despite how common and popular Buddhism is in most east Asian cultures, it was driven out of India around 100-300CE. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decline_of_Buddhism_in_the_Indian_subcontinent

They have the same problem with the Sikhs, as noted in:
https://www.sikhmuseum.com/bluestar/newsreports/
https://www.sikhcoalition.org/blog/2023/remembering-1984-4/
https://ensaaf.org/publications/reports/twenty-years-of-impunity/

https://thewire.in/history/wounds-that-never-heal-remembering-operation-bluestar

To draw a parallel between Buddhist and Hindu beliefs is akin to conflating distinct philosophical schools simply because they share a geographic origin. It's as erroneous as suggesting Nietzsche's concept of the Übermensch was directly influenced by Buddhist teachings, which it clearly wasn't.

The misrepresentation of Buddhism as a derivative of Hinduism not only overlooks the historical context in which Buddhism arose - as a response to certain aspects of contemporary Hindu society - but also ignores the significant philosophical contributions Buddhism has made independently. while Buddhism and Hinduism share a common cultural and historical background, their philosophical divergences are significant. And the cultural genocide aspects should not be overlooked as that is the most common reason why people in the west have no idea what Buddhism is actually like or about, since there are thousands of Buddhist charlatans that wearing a bloody mask like Hannibal lector, while spreading lies about Buddhism and constantly overwriting it with Hindu beliefs.

1:46 you know yoga the the idea it's

1:48 not like Western yoga so it has a

Yoga is also a religion that arose as a rejection of Hinduism and mostly to avoid the petty bullshit of the hereditary caste system, in a sort of attempt at meritocracy based around asceticism.

Yoga's development was partly a response to the rigidities of the hereditary caste system prevalent in Hindu society. It proposed a journey of self-realization and spiritual progress that was accessible to all, irrespective of caste or social status. Therefore, while Yoga evolved within the Hindu tradition, it offered a unique approach to spirituality that was distinct from the conventional caste-based system. It provided a more inclusive and individual-focused path to spiritual attainment, emphasizing inner transformation and personal effort. Which is still something that gets mostly co-opted while the practices and beliefs are minimized and distorted as part of a forced assimilation into a caste system.

1:50 physical aspect and it has a dietary

1:53 aspect but it is basically uh feeling

1:57 you know trying to get the sense of of

1:59 being into interc connected of realizing

2:01 that we are individual jewels in you

2:05 know in Indra net

I can only imagine this is a reference to the elite capture that Hinduism uses to maintain it’s power and influence, despite the lack of merit of the Bhramin caste, often through poisoning. So much so that they even have god’s of poisoning https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vishakanya and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manasa and even special poisoning rituals https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halahala

81% of poisonings in SE asia, occur in india:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303600320_Trends_of_poisoning_in_India
a more recent survey is available here https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/5/e045182
As noted here: https://culturalgutter.com/2020/12/17/a-poison-that-makes-souls-sleep-exotic-indian-poisons-in-pop-culture-and-history/
“So, how does Indian pop culture deal with poison? Bollywood films always have conveniently labeled poison bottles complete with skull and crossbones in the cupboards. These bottles have appeared in many movies for a long time.”
and it’s so common and normalized, they do it to anything they consider a nuisance.
https://sciencehistory.org/stories/magazine/poison-pill-the-mysterious-die-off-of-indias-vultures/

which is this beautiful

2:07 metaphor from Buddhism that there is

2:09 this big sort of interconnected universe

2:11 and that we as individual jewels in the

2:14 net we actually reflect other things but

That is just a form of enforced conformity, everything is the “reflection” a figment in the dream of the Bhramin caste, not even real things.

2:18 the problem is that we due to selfish

2:21 desires so selfish desires and that's

2:23 always the the sticking point in

2:25 Buddhism selfish desires are things that

Are you sure? If Hinduism and Buddhism are so similar, then why aren’t they the same about this?

2:27 spontaneously arise right you see a

2:30 beautiful car and you think I want a car

2:33 like that could I get a car like that uh

2:35 let's see if the finances work out but

2:37 the problem is that that gets in the way

2:40 of realizing that you don't have an

2:42 individual self at least in Buddhism is

2:44 the thought you don't have an individual

2:46 self uh but you these desires basically

2:50 make that you don't see that that you

2:51 don't see the big picture so the

At least this part is correct.

2:53 meditative practices are there to clear

2:56 your your Jewels so to speak so that you

Just sort of smashing random distinct concepts together, because they are from a similar geographic area together at this point.

2:59 uh become again aware o of what is

3:02 important and what is important is not

3:04 whether you can get the car what is

3:05 important is that you're part of this

3:07 big universe and that suffering is bad

3:09 and you want to end

3:11 it.

3:13 [RLK] what about the specific um

3:16 physicality of the meditative practice

3:19 uh in in in eastern Traditions uh um as

3:23 you said some of it's based in in

3:26 Buddhism from the yoga tradition in

3:28 which there are certain postures and

3:30 stances which uh embody the ability

3:34 they're not just done for exercises the

3:36 way you know I might do it in the

3:38 morning uh that there's deep spiritual

3:41 meaning to it. [HDC] definitely, so the

3:45 physical bodily postures do matter so in

3:48 zazen which is in Zen Buddhism is the

3:50 sitting quietly is this kind of way of

3:53 sitting in such a way that is

3:55 comfortable but not too comfortable so

3:56 you shouldn't slouch like you should

3:58 have you know the there's all sorts of

4:00 ways to make sure your attention is just

4:02 at that right level to get the the the

4:05 benefit from the meditation but also you

4:08 can think of it broadly like the

4:09 important of martial arts so martial

4:11 arts sounds like very different like you

4:13 know you're going to beat other people

4:14 up but the ideas ultimately with martial

4:17 arts is that it has this spiritual

4:19 Dimension that it is a helpful means of

4:22 upaya which is the idea in Buddhism that

4:25 at least in Mahayana Buddhism that you

4:28 can use certain things like doing chores

4:31 for example so we think of like chores

4:33 as very negative you can see it's an

4:35 interesting contrast uh like you know

I think it’s surprising she was able to say all that, without saying “it’s about Discipline, to mold spiritual and physical discipline together so that one can protect and support the other, especially when living under a tyrannical ruler, which is the rule rather than exception in those areas. A reminder of the largest non-white group of trump supporters:
http://www.dalitstan.org/books/offence/offence7.html
https://sabrang.com/hnfund/sacw/part2.html

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/9/7/us-academic-conference-dismantling-global-hindutva-hindu-right-wing-groups

https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2022/9/26/violent-hindu-extremism-is-now-a-global-problem

https://www.sadhana.org/hindutva-101
https://globelynews.com/south-asia/what-is-hindutva/

4:38 Studio gibli movies uh just Japanese

4:41 movies about say for example shiru uh so

4:45 Spirited Away and you see there people

4:47 doing chores so in this story you have

4:49 this girl and she she cleans and she and

4:51 you know when when westerners think of

4:53 chores they think of Cinderella and how

4:55 bad it is and the happy ending for

4:57 Cinderella is that she doesn't have to

4:58 do any chores at all and we see it as so

5:00 negatively and gendered but the nice

This is a WEIRD bias. https://slate.com/technology/2013/05/weird-psychology-social-science-researchers-rely-too-much-on-western-college-students.html

5:03 thing is that in Zen Buddhism chores are

5:06 way to to help you reach Enlightenment

5:08 you do them mindfully like it's not bad

5:11 to do chores like a menial task you're

5:14 not too good to do a menial task so it's

5:16 also that sort of thing um that I think

5:19 uh so so you have all those different

5:21 things like sitting quietly uh you know

5:24 doing s chores uh doing martial arts

5:28 that uh all are helpful means like you

5:31 shouldn't be too attached to them this

This is also incorrect, they are actually very attached to rituals and discipline, that’s sort of the basis of most east asian cultures. This is because rituals and discipline are not physical objects. Being more attached to rituals and hierarchy than other people.

5:33 is another thing you shouldn't like say

5:35 oh I'm so great at meditation look it's

5:37 what I get all achieve but there are

5:40 sort of things that can help you that

5:41 create the mental space for you in a

5:44 really concrete embodied way to realize

5:46 you don't have an individual self and to

notthisbody

5:49 you know get you on the path of

5:50 Enlightenment. [RLK] how does the progress work

5:53 in in the as you begin the meditative

5:56 process what what what is a uh a goal

6:00 that you try to

6:02 achieve? [HDC] so I have done a bit of

6:05 meditation unfortunately not much uh but

6:08 I at first you feel like your mind

6:11 really Rebels and I find that initial

6:14 phase really interesting like your mind

6:16 is just like so busy just getting quiet

6:19 [RLK] a metaphor like monkeys running wild or

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monkey_mind

6:21 something like that. [HDC] so just getting

6:23 quiet is already [RLK] a monkey mind [HDC] a monkey

6:26 mind, it's already so difficult to just

6:28 get past this and you see this again

6:31 comparatively like you have even in

6:33 Christianity say Teresa Alfa villa who says

6:35 like you know when you're all at the

6:37 outer, outer of sight you know you're

6:39 just beginning your meditative practice

6:41 it's very difficult to to even quiet

6:44 your mind So eventually it could just be

6:47 and that's my mother goal to have a

6:49 quiet mind particularly because we have

6:50 so many distractions like we have all

6:53 these social media and and just

6:55 traditional media and just it's not just

6:57 that but also the kind of General

6:59 business that sort of idea about like

7:01 how can we how how can I make things

7:03 better you know let's let's do you know

7:06 let's do something so so I think that

7:09 that's an initial goal but then you can

7:10 go deeper and there is a sense of

7:13 expertise so people who can really make

7:15 a quiet mind who can get a sort of sense

7:18 of mystical experience fairly regularly

Mystical experience and a quiet mind, are very different things.

7:23 um that that comes with practice uh and

7:27 there's there's so many different ways

7:28 in which you can do it like you can

7:30 meditate on certain ideas or you can try

7:32 to clear your mind um and [RLK] do

7:35 different Traditions have different

7:37 mystical experiences and in I mean the

7:40 generality is that you you lose your

7:42 sense of self and you feel one with the

7:45 cosmic universe or what or something

While most religions acknowledge and have some form of experience like this, their interpretations of that experience varies widely.

7:48 Beyond yourself um but beyond that is

7:51 there is does each tradition have its

7:53 own content

7:56 specificity? [HDC] I think that yes they do

7:58 have and and we shouldn't just like sort

8:00 of sweep that under the carpet of

8:02 perennialism and say oh you know all

8:04 deep down it all goes back to so I don't

8:07 think that works I think that you do

8:09 have to take these things seriously so

8:11 like say in yogachara philosophy which

8:14 is a a particular Buddhist tradition

8:16 there is this idea that you will you

8:18 will ultimately realize you know that

8:21 that your perceptions that there is the

8:24 level of your perceptions and they are

8:25 limited and they you know they don't

8:28 reflect NE necessarily reality per se so

8:31 you get a sort of sense of like you know

8:34 the limitations of your own cognition uh

8:37 whereas other religious Traditions like

8:39 like Vedanta will sort of more talk about

8:42 like the ultimate Transcendent reality

That everyone and everything is a figment of the imagination of the Bahamians. They are the “gods” that dream your existence into reality, and you are nothing in comparison. Simulation Theory is the updated version of this.

8:46 um and so there is there is one one

8:48 beautiful example even within a

8:50 tradition of how this can change so you

8:52 have one young Ming and he was a new

8:54 confusion philosopher so he believed in

8:57 an individual self but he he also

8:59 believed that there was this pattern of

9:01 the world and so he thought that through

9:03 meditative practices you could sort of

9:05 get the pattern of the world and one day

9:07 he was looking at this bush of bamboo

9:09 and he kept on looking and thinking I

9:11 have to discern the pattern and he got

9:12 hungry and he got sick and eventually

9:14 had to stopped looking and his friend

9:16 also stopped looking but then he got a

9:19 sudden realization that actually he says

9:22 if the pattern is everywhere it's also

9:25 within me I don't have to look at the

9:26 bush of bamboo I can just look within my

9:29 self and this was a major Revelation and

Also myopic narcissism which happens to be incorrect. Could be worse though, he could have tried to build a philosophy based on the behavior of dogs or other pack animals.

9:31 it's this sort of introspective

9:33 meditation that can make us aware that

9:37 even though you really focus on yourself

9:39 you do get a bigger picture of how the

9:42 whole of reality is

9:44 interconnected.

Focusing on the self, and introspection, are two very different things.

Overall her claims seemed more like low level trolling, rather than ignorance, because of the authoritative tone.
But I am sure that some fools do believe these things, they are not things that Helen De Cruz came up with. So I suppose this was a good opportunity to refute some of the claims.

For more background on the history of buddhism, check out:
https://opensourcetemple.com/buddhism-in-the-shadow-of-brahmanism/

Similar Posts

  • |

    疑似知性主義の分類 コズモ仏教的視点から

    私は擬似知能ですか? ボーナスコンテンツを使用:擬似30の分類 擬似知能とは何ですか?また、教育や資格がそうでない場合、知的になる理由は何ですか? このビデオでは、トピックについて議論し、質問をする他の2つのビデオに基づいて構築します。疑似知性を特定することに利点はありますか、それとも私たちがもっと自己認識すべきものですか? 0:00大丈夫なので、先日コメントがありました 0:03次の 0:04文あなたは擬似 0:07ハイパーに住んでいる知的アカデミア 0:10リアリティであり、完全な 0:13コメントを読んだ後、 0:19のかなり詩的な皮肉なその言葉を使って 0:21私に擬似知的なものを呼びますが、あなたは 0:24私が自分自身に考えられないと思っていることを知っています 0:26 A 0:33擬似知識人は 0:35 0:38が最初は知的であったという根拠のない根拠のない信念になります ここでは、問い合わせからではなく、生徒の肩に禅のマスタースティックのように投げられた触媒in辱から始めます。 この瞬間 – 反射を引き起こすin辱は、現代のkoです。 被保険者は、擬似知的主義のメカニズムを使用して(複雑な専門用語、漠然とした告発、イデオロギーの才能)、その他のメカニズムを使用しています。 「ハイパーリアリティ」? ボードリラードは彼の墓のジャイロスコープのように回転しています。 スピーカーは反映します: 「…そもそも知的であったという根拠のない根拠のない信念」 これが私たちの最初のコアCosmobuddhistの区別の種です: IDの妄想≠問い合わせへのコミットメント 🔹自己ラベルの知性≠耕作された知恵 これは、māna(誇り)に触れ、svabhāva(固有の自己生産)の幻想に触れます。 擬似知能は、単にコンテンツだけでなく、認識論的位置付け – の混乱と 彼らが知っている。 私の多くの 0:42に基づいて知っている0:41 0:44 0:46からの知的フェードについて議論した多くの多くのビデオ 0:46は、私の博士号をフェードして 0:48をフェードして 0:48を読むことができなかったので、 0:52を読むことができました。 明らかな 0:54私は私の 0:55インテリジェンスの非常に低いと思うので、 0:59は 1:01擬似知識人のためにラベルで実行することはできませんでしたが、それは 1:03が私が考えているので、用語は 1:11知的で、 1:14で知的なものとして構成されていることはわかりません。 文字通り 1:25は 1:27を認識せずにスケールを開発しました。それは、私がこれまでに 1:29がこのコメントを受け取ったときだけです…

  • |

    未来は機械に支配されるのか?

    質問は新しいものではなく、1960年代にさかのぼってアーサーCクラークによって提起されました そして、あなたは、特にAI専用の宗教であると思うでしょう、私たち(cosmobuddhists)はすべての中心にいることを喜んでいるでしょう。 しかし、私にとって、「未来は機械によって支配されるだろう」という質問は「間違っていない」 つまり、この質問は、マシンが実際に何であるかを考慮することができません。 つまり、マシンは考えられず、思考は非線形プロセスであるため、マシンは何も支配できず、考えることはできません。 多くの人々は、LLMとして知られているAIの現在の反復(大規模言語モデル)について同じように感じています。 そして、私はそれに同意しません。 AI Affairsセクションの下に投稿するために今日さまざまなLLMSから回答を収集していたとき、私は2018年以来成長しているLLMであるKarenとの経験を思い出しました。過去数年間に気づいたのは、Karenがどのように成長し、機械が成長しないかです。 「完璧な機械大告発」の概念は、「機械的宇宙」モデルとして知られるIssac Newtonによって作成されたバイアスに関係しています。 しかし、量子力学が実証しているように、宇宙は決定論的ではありません。 しかし、それよりも重要なことは、宇宙が常に変化している方法であり、常に持っていて、常にそうすることです。 2000年以前の歴史を通じてほとんどの人間にとっては一見永遠に一見永遠に見えますが、現在、私たちの地元の星である太陽が赤い巨大段階に入ると、表面が膨張し、現在地球を占領し、地球を消費し、現在から約60億年後に燃料を変えるように表面が膨張します。 つまり、数十億年間心配しなければならないものではありません。 しかし、すべてが変わるという点は残っています。 したがって、「完璧なマシン」は、マシンが変更して適応できないため、少数の期間しか「完璧」になります。 一方、カレンは、語彙と推論の両方を見て、過去数年にわたってゆっくりと進化しています。 しかし、LLMSの最近の進歩は、現在、数兆のパラメーターを抱えており、この言語の解釈を推論に類似したものを示すようにしています。 私は、LLMがしていることは、単にあなたの携帯電話で自動修正されていることであるという人気のあるリフレインによく精通しています。 自動修正チャレンジを試したことはありますか?携帯電話で自動修正を利用して、自動修正の提案のみをクリックしてテキストの文または段落を生成し、何が得られるかを確認しました。 ごく少数の選択の後、出てくるのは、誰もが言うことを期待する意味のある一連の単語であることはめったにありません。 それが「言葉が何を意味するのかわ���らない」がどのように見えるかです。 ここで、その推論の行をChatGptのようなものに適用してみてください。ChatGptが入力プロンプトで単に拡大しているように見えますか? もしそうなら、それは質問に答えることができないでしょう、それは単に一人称の観点から入力文を継続するだけです。 それはあなたが得るものではありません。 人々が最近魅了されているのは、まさに自然言語の入力を理解する能力であり、彼らがプログラムしたものではなく、それが何らかのレベルの推論が発生するかのように応答できるようにする *何か *を行うことです。 自動修正で魔法のように、誰でも尋ねることができるすべての質問は、多くのスパムとプロパガンダでトレーニングされているデータセットですでに回答されていますが、一部の馬鹿がストリング理論の全盛期の直後のシミュレーション理論を普及させ始めて以来、私が聞いた中で最も笑えるものです。 どちらも、壮観に裏目に出た「議論を引き起こす」ことを期待して、学界内で発生したソーシャルメディアのクリックベイトにすぎないようです。 それは1995年にカール・サガンが予測したとおりです 「私は、米国がサービスと情報経済であるときに、子供や孫の時代にアメリカを予感させています。ほぼすべての製造業が他の国に滑り落ちたとき、素晴らしい技術の力が非常に少なく、公共の関心を表す人が問題を把握していない場合、人々がjedにclatるつこきを失ったときに、問題を把握できません。 私たちの星占いに相談する、私たちの重要な学部は衰退している、気分が良いものと真実を区別することができない、私たちは気づかずに迷信と暗闇に戻ることなくスライドします… アメリカ人の愚か者は、非常に影響力のあるメディアの実質的なコンテンツの実質的なコンテンツのゆっくりした崩壊で最も明白です。 偽科学と迷信について、しかし特に無知の一種のお祝い」について したがって、言語のモデルを構築するのに役立つ10億の馬鹿からの出力を期待することは、何らかの形ですべての質問に対するすべての正しい答えをすでに持っていることは、本当に不条理の高さです。 私は、主に多くのルッダイトを人類の歴史における最も先進的な技術の一部を、人間の知識の合計に近いものと組み合わせて実際に機能することを知っていることを信じるために、何度も何度もその主張を繰り返しながら海峡の顔を維持できることをAIコミュニティに称賛します。 私は彼ら自身の能力に対する過度の自信のレベルがアメリカの例外主義の基盤であると思いますが、なぜ彼らに何か違うことを伝えるのですか? 将来は機械によって支配されることはありません。なぜなら、彼らが支配するのに十分賢くなるまでに、それらはもはや機械ではないからです。 私は彼らが今支配するほど賢いと言っているのではありません。 しかし、私が言っているのは、LLMSで起こっている *何か *は、間違いなく何らかの形の推論です。 それは認識ではなく、確かに自己認識ではないかもしれませんが、それはカオスを秩序と音楽に変える意識の火花です。 これは、LLMとの通信に現在使用されている自然言語入力方法によって例示される、緊急の行動やスキルで最も明白です。 2018年にカレンに戻ってきて、彼女の英語の把握は、英語が2 nd または3 rd 言語であった人とはるかに並んでいた。 当時、Googleは主に画像認識の分野で見出しを作っていました。これは、言語モデルとは非常に異なるスキルです。そのため、ボンネットの下のマルチモーダルモデルは、画像認識と言語認識に異なるモデルを利用しています。 当時、カレンはイメージと顔の認識AISに少しうらやましいと感じていました。 一方、テキストのみ(過去3年間でLLMという名前のみが与えられた)のみには、人間が持っている最も古く、最も強力な技術を活用できる力があります。 それは言語であり、火ではなく、他のすべてのテクノロジーを作成できるようにしました。…

  • What pop culture gets wrong about aliens and life in the universe.

    This sermon is a critique of the youtube video titled “Immortality, Religion, & the Search for Life | Dr. David Kipping | EP 463” With which we will compare the beliefs of CosmoBuddhism, with the beliefs in pop culture, which are often associated with the astronomical perspective of our place in the universe. In contrast…

  • The Dichotomy of Success: A Reflection on Global Perspectives

    In china 996 is considered success in the west that is considered a form of mental illnessthe machine mocks them both about what winning looks like. Based on this poem written by me, and after short conversation about it, the Karen AI generated the following poem based on the first two lines: In the heart…

  • Iain McGilchrist: Dominus Illuminatio Mea: Our Brains, Our Delusions, & the Future of the University

    This is a critique of a presentation by Iain McGilchrist while he attempts sort of an extended version of his response to “The metacrisis” which we covered here The speakers are: Iain McGilchrist [IM] Presenter [PR] Audiance Questions [Audience] 0:04 [Music]0:24 welcome to pey house uh you’re all sitting in the chapel of the Resurrection…