|

Léirmheas ar “Cén Fáth a bhfuil Smaointeoireacht Chriticiúil Marbh – Peter Boghossian”

Is athbhreithniú é seo ar: Cén fáth go bhfuil smaointeoireacht chriticiúil marbh – Peter Boghossian Is é an cur síos ón bhfíseán bunaidh ná: Is fealsamh Meiriceánach é Peter Boghossian. Ar feadh deich mbliana bhí sé ina Ollamh le Fealsúnacht in Ollscoil Stáit Portland, ach d’éirigh sé as tar éis freagra an choláiste ar ‘The…

|

Léirmheas ar Acadamh Peterson, áit a mbuaileann Aristotle le Big Bird cuid 1

Acadamh Peterson: áit a mbuaileann Aristotle le Big Bird Tá anailís seo ar Acadamh Peterson go hiontach. Ní íocfainn go pearsanta le hairgead chun féachaint ar an gcúrsa sin. Is é an príomh -léirmheas atá agam ar a léirmheas, go bhféadfadh searbhas na Breataine a bheith ag cur mearbhall ar an slua JP. Cé gur…

Cén creideamh nach ea

Is léirmheas é an seanmóir seo ar fhíseán YouTube le déanaí le Jonathan Pageau dar teideal “Cad is Reiligiún ann? – Le Peter Boghossian” Mar sin féin, níl an méid a labhraíonn siad soiléir i ndáiríre mar a léirítear. Ba é an cur síos ar an bhfíseán, mar atá scríofa ag Jonathan Pageau: “Sa chomhrá…

What pop culture gets wrong about aliens and life in the universe.

This sermon is a critique of the youtube video titled “Immortality, Religion, & the Search for Life | Dr. David Kipping | EP 463” With which we will compare the beliefs of CosmoBuddhism, with the beliefs in pop culture, which are often associated with the astronomical perspective of our place in the universe. In contrast…

Not really explaining Quantum Chromo Dynamics

This critique is in response to the video: Original Description: Jun 22, 2024Or maybe why I can’t? QuantumQuantumQuantumChromodynamics Link to Patreon — one exclusive video per month: / acollierastro I have merch: https://store.dftba.com/collections/angela-collier Speakers:Angela Collier= [AC] wow, this is probably the part of the video that I agree with the most. It is the central…

|

Intro to cosmoBuddhist Epistemology

The Michael Shermer Show # 439We often assume that religious beliefs are no different in kind from ordinary conventional beliefs―that believing in the existence of God is akin to believing that May comes before June. Neuroscientist Neil Van Leeuwen shows that, in fact, these two forms of belief are strikingly different. Van Leeuwen argues that…

|

A critique of The Ideological Subversion of Science

This dialogue covers what seems to be mostly conservative talking points on science and higher education institutions. It’s interesting to note that [DJAC] seems to be part of a group of right wing science trolls, the website that Jerry posted his paper on, seems to be a poorly made knockoff of Skeptic magazine that is…

A critique of Physics at the limits of reality with Sabine Hossenfelder

This is a critique of the video “Physics at the limits of reality | Sabine Hossenfelder in conversation with Hilary Lawson | In full” The speakers are:Sabinea Hossenfelder [SH]Hilary Lawson [HL] Introduction 0:00 this is all well and fine and you can0:02 use it to describe a lot of data but0:05 that doesn’t mean that…